- From: David Singer <singer@apple.com>
- Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2013 16:24:28 -0500
- To: Matthias Schunter <mts-std@schunter.org> (Intel Corporation)
- Cc: public-tracking@w3.org
On Feb 11, 2013, at 16:14 , Matthias Schunter (Intel Corporation) <mts-std@schunter.org> wrote: > Hi Team, > > fyi: I have closed ISSUEs 190, 173, 138 > I have left ISSUE-144 and ISSUE-187 open for our Wednesday discussion. > > Regards, > matthias That means the sync-up update changes: my usual pass, looking at TPE issues as reported in the draft and the database. issue in document in database action These mis-match in what is said; I have a suggested action in the last column. 112 pending review open update DB 137 pending review open update DB 140 pending review closed remove from document 144 open pending review update document 160 pending review closed remove from document 190 pending review closed remove from document None of these are in the document at all; I rather suspect that issues we have taken up or tried to resolve (open, pending review) should be inserted: 151 open 152 open 164 open 176 open 153 pending review 173 pending review 187 pending review 141 raised 143 raised 167 raised 182 raised 185 raised These match; no action required… 111 postponed postponed 136 open open 159 raised raised 161 pending review pending review 168 open open 138 closed > > On 21/01/2013 08:07, Matthias Schunter (Intel Corporation) wrote: >> Hi Team, >> >> I suggest to batch-close the issues listed below that have been marked PENDING REVIEW for a while. >> If you disagree with my proposal to close any of those issues, please respond by Wednesday, Jan 30. >> >> Regards, >> matthias >> -------------------------------- >> ISSUE-138: Web-Wide Exception Well Known URI >> http://www.w3.org/2011/tracking-protection/track/issues/138 >> >> The issue was how to obtain exceptions without Javascript-able real-estate. Our discussions are reflected in Section 6.8 of the current spec and (unless someone objects), I plan to close ISSUE-138. >> -------------------------------- >> ISSUE-144: User-granted Exceptions: Constraints on user agent behavior while granting and for future requests? >> http://www.w3.org/2011/tracking-protection/track/issues/144 >> >> IMHO, the new approach to exceptions has removed the requirements on the user agent. >> As a consequence, I believe we can close this issue. >> -------------------------------- >> ISSUE-187: What is the right approach to exception handling? >> http://www.w3.org/2011/tracking-protection/track/issues/187 >> >> During the last call, I validated that there is a general preference for pursuing our rivised approach to exceptions (where the sites records preference and the UA may double-check it with the user). All participants can live with this approach. >> I suggest to close ISSUE-187. >> ---------------------------------- >> ISSUE-190: Sites with multiple first parties >> http://www.w3.org/2011/tracking-protection/track/issues/190 >> >> Roy has proposed changes as response to ACTION-328 and (unless there are objections), I suggest to implement the changes suggested: >> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-tracking/2012Nov/0004.html >> >> ----------------------------------- >> ISSUE-173: The TPE uses "top-level domain" in a sense that is not the normal meaning >> http://www.w3.org/2011/tracking-protection/track/issues/173 >> >> AFAIK, David Singer has introduced the corresponding bug fixes to the spec. This ISSUE has thus been resolved and can be closed. >> >> >> > > David Singer Multimedia and Software Standards, Apple Inc.
Received on Monday, 11 February 2013 21:24:58 UTC