Concerns with ISSUE-161

Hi David,

on our call today, we did not have strong supporters for keeping 
ISSUE-197 and ISSUE-161 open.
Since you were not present, I would like to ask you to elaborate on your 
concerns by email to understand them better.

ISSUE-161 Do we need a tracking status value for partial compliance? 
(Matthias, Jack Hobaugh, David Wainberg)

We currently have a signal "!" that says that you do not claim 
compliance. This signal has been inserted to address ISSUE-161 to allow 
a site to say that it is not (yet) claiming compliance. This can have 
many reasions such as being under construction, testing, technical 
problems, ...

What are your concerns with this resolution?


Regards,
matthias



-------- Original-Nachricht --------
Betreff: 	Updated Agenda for December 04, 2013 call - V02
Weitersenden-Datum: 	Tue, 03 Dec 2013 18:48:09 +0000
Weitersenden-Von: 	public-tracking@w3.org
Datum: 	Tue, 03 Dec 2013 19:47:35 +0100
Von: 	Ninja Marnau <ninja@w3.org>
An: 	public-tracking@w3.org (public-tracking@w3.org) 
<public-tracking@w3.org>



-----------------

1. Confirmation of scribe. Volunteers welcome!

2. Offline-caller-identification (see end for instructions)

----------------------------------
---- Issues for this Call ---

Note: See more info at the end for details.

ISSUE-153 What are the implications on software that changes requests 
but does not necessarily initiate them? (Matthias and Brad Kulick)
http://www.w3.org/2011/tracking-protection/track/issues/153 
<http://www.w3.org/2011/tracking-protection/track/issues/151%C2%A0>
      December 04: M1 (discussion): Initial change proposals have been 
submitted; Discussion on change proposals; Call for final list of change 
proposals
December 11: M2 (discussion): list of change proposals is frozen; 
Discussion whether clear consensus emerges for one change proposal

ISSUE-161 Do we need a tracking status value for partial compliance? 
(Matthias, Jack Hobaugh, David Wainberg)
http://www.w3.org/2011/tracking-protection/track/issues/161 
<http://www.w3.org/2011/tracking-protection/track/issues/151%C2%A0>
      December 04: M1 (discussion): Initial change proposals have been 
submitted; Discussion on change proposals; Call for final list of change 
proposals

ISSUE-197 How do we notify the user why a Disregard signal is received? 
(Matthias, Jack Hobaugh, David Wainberg)
http://www.w3.org/2011/tracking-protection/track/issues/197 
<http://www.w3.org/2011/tracking-protection/track/issues/151%C2%A0>
      December 04: M1 (discussion): Initial change proposals have been 
submitted; Discussion on change proposals; Call for final list of change 
proposals

ISSUES-217, -228 (definition of network interaction and user 
interaction) (Carl)
http://www.w3.org/wiki/Privacy/TPWG/Change_Proposal_Revise_network_interaction_definition 
<http://www.w3.org/wiki/Privacy/TPWG/Change_Proposal_Transience_Collection>
     December 02: M3 (announcement): Call for objections to validate / 
determine consensus
     December 18: M5 (deadline): Deadline for inputs to call for 
objections (2 weeks after M3); Analysis starts

AoB

--------------------------------------------------------------------------
---- Issues not for this Call but currently processed ---

ISSUE-151 User Agent Requirement: Be able to handle an exception request 
(Justin or Matthias)
http://www.w3.org/2011/tracking-protection/track/issues/151 
<http://www.w3.org/2011/tracking-protection/track/issues/151%C2%A0>
      December 04: M2 (discussion): list of change proposals is frozen; 
Discussion whether clear consensus emerges for one change proposal
December 11: M3 (announcement): Call for objections to validate / 
determine consensus

ISSUE-5 and ISSUE-10 (Justin)
http://www.w3.org/2011/tracking-protection/track/issues/5 
<http://www.w3.org/2011/tracking-protection/track/issues/10>
http://www.w3.org/2011/tracking-protection/track/issues/10
https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/49311/twpg-tracking-5/
https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/49311/tpwg-party-10/
     November 20: M5 (deadline): Deadline for inputs to call for 
objections (2 weeks after M3); Analysis starts
     December 11: M7 (announcement): Results are announced

ISSUE-16, -204 What does it mean to collect, retain, use, and share 
data? (Carl or Justin)
http://www.w3.org/2011/tracking-protection/track/issues/16
http://www.w3.org/wiki/Privacy/TPWG/Change_Proposal_Transience_Collection
December 04: M5 (deadline): Deadline for inputs to call for objections 
(2 weeks after M3); Analysis starts
     December 18: M7 (announcement): Results are announced

================ Summary Documentation on Resolving ISSUES =================

PHASES to resolve issues:
M0 (announcement): Initial call for change proposals; All change 
proposals should be drafted
M1 (discussion): Initial change proposals have been submitted; 
Discussion on change proposals; Call for final list of change proposals
M2 (discussion): List of change proposals is frozen; Discussion whether 
clear consensus emerges for one change proposal
M3 (announcement): Call for objections to validate / determine consensus
M5 (deadline): Deadline for inputs to call for objections (2 weeks after 
M3); Analysis starts
M7 (announcement): Results are announced

STATUS of the ISSUES:
- OPEN During phases M0, M1, M2
- PENDING REVIEW: During phases M3, M5
- CLOSED after M7
All other issues are RAISED.
-----
================ Infrastructure =================

Zakim teleconference bridge:
VoIP: sip:zakim@voip.w3.org <http://voip.w3.org/>
Phone +1.617.761.6200 <tel:+1.617.761.6200> passcode TRACK (87225)
IRC Chat: irc.w3.org <http://irc.w3.org/><http://irc.w3.org/>, port 
6665, #dnt

OFFLINE caller identification:
If you intend to join the phone call, you must either associate your
phone number with your IRC username once you've joined the call
(command: "Zakim, [ID] is [name]" e.g., "Zakim, ??P19 is schunter" in my
case), or let Nick know your phone number ahead of time. If you are not
comfortable with the Zakim IRC syntax for associating your phone number,
please email your name and phone number to
npdoty@w3.org <mailto:npdoty@w3.org><mailto:npdoty@w3.org>. We want to 
reduce (in fact,
eliminate) the time spent on the call identifying phone numbers. Note
that if your number is not identified and you do not respond to
off-the-phone reminders via IRC, you will be dropped from the call.