- From: JC Cannon <jccannon@microsoft.com>
- Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2012 05:10:49 +0000
- To: David Singer <singer@apple.com>, Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
- CC: Shane Wiley <wileys@yahoo-inc.com>, "public-tracking@w3.org" <public-tracking@w3.org>
David, I don't quite understand what you are trying to say here. JC -----Original Message----- From: David Singer [mailto:singer@apple.com] Sent: Friday, April 27, 2012 8:15 AM To: Bjoern Hoehrmann Cc: Shane Wiley; public-tracking@w3.org Subject: Re: Action-157: Update logged-in consent proposal On Apr 26, 2012, at 15:59 , Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote: > * Shane Wiley wrote: >> <Normative> >> >> Sites MAY override a user's DNT preference if they have received explicit, informed consent to do so. > > That means "a user's DNT preference" does not apply to this situation. > I see no reason why this should be an "override" rather than a "n/a". Because the user is sending "DNT:1" and also "you have my consent"; these are in conflict. It's by no means not applicable to state which overrides which. David Singer Multimedia and Software Standards, Apple Inc.
Received on Saturday, 28 April 2012 05:11:29 UTC