- From: Rebecca Hauck <rhauck@adobe.com>
- Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2013 11:03:46 -0700
- To: "Linss, Peter" <peter.linss@hp.com>, Tobie Langel <tobie@w3.org>
- CC: James Graham <james@hoppipolla.co.uk>, "public-test-infra@w3.org" <public-test-infra@w3.org>
On 8/1/13 9:37 AM, "Linss, Peter" <peter.linss@hp.com> wrote: > >On Jul 31, 2013, at 3:43 PM, Tobie Langel wrote: > >> On Thursday, August 1, 2013 at 12:36 AM, Rebecca Hauck wrote: >>> This all looks great, but I'm wondering/hoping if this is code that >>>can be >>> run on the csswg-test repo as well. It's proving to be >>>super-complicated >>> trying to document both worlds. Even if it takes a bit more time to >>> consolidate the repositories, it would be great if they ran mostly the >>> same way in parallel in the interim. Peter Linss, can you comment on >>>this? >> >> Making that system work for multiple repositories implies some >>significant refactoring (I've been cutting corners) or setting up a >>second instance. > >I'd be happy to set up a second instance running on csswg.org for the >interim. Can you elaborate on what this would mean or look like to contributors? I'm leery of creating a new repo URL (if that's even what this would mean) as we've widely broadcast the current one. > >> >> What is preventing us from consolidating the CSS and web-platform-test >>repositories at this stage? > >The fact that we have ~2000 review comments over the course of two years >in a pre-existing system that we're not willing to throw away. The plan >of record is that I'm going to be adapting our existing system to >integrate with GitHub. Once that's working, and we can merge our existing >review data, we'll move our tests into the main repo. > >Peter
Received on Thursday, 1 August 2013 18:05:41 UTC