- From: Linss, Peter <peter.linss@hp.com>
- Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2013 16:37:59 +0000
- To: Tobie Langel <tobie@w3.org>
- CC: Rebecca Hauck <rhauck@adobe.com>, James Graham <james@hoppipolla.co.uk>, "public-test-infra@w3.org" <public-test-infra@w3.org>
On Jul 31, 2013, at 3:43 PM, Tobie Langel wrote: > On Thursday, August 1, 2013 at 12:36 AM, Rebecca Hauck wrote: >> This all looks great, but I'm wondering/hoping if this is code that can be >> run on the csswg-test repo as well. It's proving to be super-complicated >> trying to document both worlds. Even if it takes a bit more time to >> consolidate the repositories, it would be great if they ran mostly the >> same way in parallel in the interim. Peter Linss, can you comment on this? > > Making that system work for multiple repositories implies some significant refactoring (I've been cutting corners) or setting up a second instance. I'd be happy to set up a second instance running on csswg.org for the interim. > > What is preventing us from consolidating the CSS and web-platform-test repositories at this stage? The fact that we have ~2000 review comments over the course of two years in a pre-existing system that we're not willing to throw away. The plan of record is that I'm going to be adapting our existing system to integrate with GitHub. Once that's working, and we can merge our existing review data, we'll move our tests into the main repo. Peter
Received on Thursday, 1 August 2013 16:39:28 UTC