- From: Marcus Rohrmoser <me+swicg@mro.name>
- Date: Sun, 9 Jul 2023 21:56:06 +0200
- To: public-swicg@w3.org
On Sat, 8 Jul 2023 17:19:00 -0700 Johannes Ernst <johannes.ernst@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Jul 8, 2023, at 15:32, Benjamin Goering <ben@bengo.co> wrote: > > 8.2 Use-Case: Real-time Collaboration > ... > >> [1] https://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/socialweb/XGR-socialweb-20101206/ > > Re-reading this report is fascinating because the vision what should be was so much broader than what was implement — and much broader than it appears to be today. > > Why is that? Don’t those use cases make sense? (I think they do) Have they been superseded? (I don’t think so). So …? Count me baffled … seriously, you are surprised? If there are tight feedback loops available and features go through A/B tests, only the pofitable ones survive if that's your decision driver. Now look round. I am not surprised. Big solutions are appealing to and acceptable by many. Agreed on by many. What but mediocre could they be. But a plethora of small approaches and solutions can show excellence. /Marcus --
Received on Sunday, 9 July 2023 19:56:16 UTC