RE: Meeting record: 2007-11-20 SWD telecon

Hi Antoine,

You are absolutely correct. It was the update of the document to show how skos concepts are different from owl classes that was dropped as defined below.

> <scribe> *ACTION:* Alistair and Guus write draft section in primer on
> relationship between SKOS concepts and OWL classes for OWL DL users
> [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/11/06-swd-minutes.html#action05]
> *[CONTINUES]*
>
> <scribe> *ACTION:* Alistair to update semantics document to listing ways
> in which SKOS diverges from OWL DL [recorded in
> http://www.w3.org/2007/10/08-swd-minutes.html#action06] *[DROPPED]*

Regards,

Quentin

-----Original Message-----
From: Antoine Isaac [mailto:aisaac@few.vu.nl]
Sent: Fri 23/11/2007 22:33
To: Reul, Q. H.; SWD WG
Subject: Re: Meeting record: 2007-11-20 SWD telecon
 
Hi Quentin,

Thanks for the minutes. But as we discussed then, the action

>  
> *[DROPPED]* *ACTION:* Alistair and Guus write draft section in primer on
> relationship between SKOS concepts and OWL classes for OWL DL users
> [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/11/06-swd-minutes.html#action05]
>   

was not dropped. Or I missed something (which I would not be pleased 
with as one of the Primer's editor ;-)...

Cheers,

Antoine
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>       Admin
>
> <scribe> PROPOSED to accept minutes of the Nov 6 telecon
>
> RESOLVED to accept minutes of the Nov 6 telecon
>
> Next telecons: 27 Nov 1600 UTC
>
>
>       SKOS
>
> <scribe> *ACTION:* Alistair will to update deliverables for SKOS
> [recorded in
> http://www.w3.org/2007/11/06-swd-minutes.html#action02]*[DONE]*
>
> aliman Alistair's schedule for SKOS
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2007Nov/0036.html
> .... suggest to look @ alternative to be added to Editor's draft
> .... needing something about mapping
>
> <scribe> *ACTION:* qreul to review Editor's draft [recorded in
> http://www.w3.org/2007/11/20-swd-minutes.html#action02]
>
> <scribe> *ACTION:* vit to review Editor's draft [recorded in
> http://www.w3.org/2007/11/20-swd-minutes.html#action03]
>
> <scribe> *ACTION:* Alistair and Guus write draft section in primer on
> relationship between SKOS concepts and OWL classes for OWL DL users
> [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/11/06-swd-minutes.html#action05]
> *[CONTINUES]*
>
> <scribe> *ACTION:* Alistair to update semantics document to listing ways
> in which SKOS diverges from OWL DL [recorded in
> http://www.w3.org/2007/10/08-swd-minutes.html#action06] *[DROPPED]*
>
> <scribe> *ACTION:* Alistair will to update deliverables for SKOS
> [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/11/06-swd-minutes.html#action02]
> *[DONE]*
>
> <scribe> *ACTION:* Ed to write suggest some text about SKOS message for
> SWEO Semantic Web FAQ [recorded in
> http://www.w3.org/2007/11/06-swd-minutes.html#action24]*[DONE]*
>
> edsu http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2007Nov/0030.html
> .... Ed suggested changes about way SKOS is presented
> .... SKOS is an ontology that can be reused
> .... SKOS could help Flickr (folksonomies) to be published
>
> Guus suggests to wait a few days and sent it before the next telecon to
> SWEO
>
> <scribe> *ACTION:* Ed to send review to SWEO by next telecon [recorded
> in http://www.w3.org/2007/11/20-swd-minutes.html#action13]
>
> <scribe> *ACTION:* Tom to amend proposals to for accepting minimal
> relation labels [recorded in
> http://www.w3.org/2007/10/23-swd-minutes.html#action12] *[DONE]*
>
> <scribe> *ACTION:* Alistair and Guus to prepare material for next week
> on Concept Schemes vs OWL Ontologies [recorded in
> http://www.w3.org/2007/10/30-swd-minutes.html#action04][CONTINUES]
>
> <scribe> *ACTION:* Guus to write up the issue [of Label Resource] and
> add to the issue list. [recorded in
> http://www.w3.org/2007/10/09-swd-minutes.html#action01] *[CONTINUES]*
>
> <scribe> *ACTION:* Ralph to reconstruct proposal for semantics of
> isDefinedBy [recorded in
> http://www.w3.org/2007/10/30-swd-minutes.html#action02] *[CONTINUES]*
>
> edsuSKOS Top priority
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2007Nov/0043.html
>
> aliman describe the different issues to be resolved for first
> publication
> .... f2f identified issue 39
> http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/39 
> and issue 56 http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/56
> .... propose adding issues on SKOS documentation (issue 27
> http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/27)
> .... also raised issue 64 http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/64
> and issue 65 http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/65
>
> Antoine says the mapping is very important and will produce a document
> next 
> .... week but wonders whether should concentrate on SKOS documentation
> properties
>
> Guus happy to leave SKOS documentation out too
>
> aliman wonders whether we can stick with what has been defined so far
> .... issue 27 need to be resolved
>
> Guus suggest that solution to issue 26 can be reused
>
> aliman informs that we currently have a link to a literal
> .... propose having one property linking to a literal
>
> Antoine thinks that both issues have the same technical problem
> .... and should use the same solution
>
> Guus assumed that the group would use his proposal to solve issue 26
> .... but highlights that current proposal could cause a problem with
> issue 27
>
> aliman happy to own issue 64 and 65
>
> Guus takes over issue 27
>
> aliman suggests that the solution to issue 56 is whether or not it is in
> the scope of the 1st SKOS document
> .... potential treading on logical language such as OWL
>
> Guus suggests that seanb to take over issue 56
>
> <edsu> seanb++
>
>
>       RDFa
>
> <scribe> *ACTION:* Ben and Michael to address comments by Tom [regarding
> maintenance of wiki document http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/wiki/RDFa]
> [recorded in
> http://www.w3.org/2007/11/20-swd-minutes.html#action14]*[CONTINUES]*
>
> <scribe> *ACTION:* Ben to prepare draft implementation report for RDFa
> (with assistance from Michael) [recorded in
> http://www.w3.org/2007/10/08-swd-minutes.html#action03] *[CONTINUES]*
>
> <scribe> *ACTION:* Ben to update RDFa schedule in wiki
> [http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/wiki/RDFa#RDFa_schedule] [recorded in
> http://www.w3.org/2007/10/08-swd-minutes.html#action04] *[CONTINUES]*
>
> <scribe> *ACTION:* Guus/Tom to propose joint decisions for reviews for
> major [RDFa] steps/transition requests. Informal agreement about working
> drafts. [recorded in
> http://www.w3.org/2007/11/20-swd-minutes.html#action17]*[CONTINUES]*
>
>
>       Recipes
>
> <scribe> *ACTION:* Dan to ask apache about conditional redirects
> [recorded in
> http://www.w3.org/2007/11/20-swd-minutes.html#action18]*[CONTINUES]*
>
> <scribe> *ACTION:* Diego to recast Recipe 6 [recorded in
> http://www.w3.org/2007/11/20-swd-minutes.html#action19]*[CONTINUES]*
>
> <scribe> *ACTION:* Guus/Tom to solicit reviewers for the Recipes
> document. [recorded in
> http://www.w3.org/2007/11/20-swd-minutes.html#action20]*[CONTINUES]*
>
> <scribe> *ACTION:* Jon to add words that acknowledge the existence of
> RDFa as [recorded in
> http://www.w3.org/2007/11/20-swd-minutes.html#action21]*[CONTINUES]*
>
> <scribe> *ACTION:* Jon to make changes as proposed [with regard to
> Issue-23] [recorded in
> http://www.w3.org/2007/11/20-swd-minutes.html#action22]*[CONTINUES]*
>
> <scribe> *ACTION:* Ralph propose resolution to ISSUE-16 "Default
> behavior" [recorded in
> http://www.w3.org/2007/11/20-swd-minutes.html#action23]*[CONTINUES]*
>
> <scribe> *ACTION:*Ralph to come up with a URI for wiki page [for Recipes
> implementations] [recorded in
> http://www.w3.org/2007/11/20-swd-minutes.html#action24]*[CONTINUES]*
>
> <scribe> *ACTION:* Ralph/Diego to work on Wordnet implementation [of
> Recipes] [recorded in
> http://www.w3.org/2007/11/20-swd-minutes.html#action25]*[CONTINUES]*
>
> <scribe> *ACTION:* TF leaders to prepare a version of Recipes for review
> in December [recorded in
> http://www.w3.org/2007/11/20-swd-minutes.html#action26]*[CONTINUES]*
>
>
>       VOCABULARY MANAGEMENT
>
> <scribe> *ACTION:* Vit and Elisa to include in the document all the
> target sections plus an allocation of sections to people and potentially
> a standard structure for sections [recorded in
> http://www.w3.org/2007/11/20-swd-minutes.html#action27]*[CONTINUES]*
>
>       AOB
>
> SWEO request for input to Semantic Web FAQ re: SKOS
> see http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2007Nov/0002.html
>
>
> ******************************************
> * Quentin H. Reul                        *
> * PhD Research Student                   *
> * Department of Computing Science        *
> * University of Aberdeen, King's College *
> * Room 238 in the Meston Building        *
> * ABERDEEN AB24 3UE                      *
> * Phone: +44 (0)1224 27 4485             *
> * http://www.csd.abdn.ac.uk/~qreul       *
> ******************************************
>
>
>
>