- From: Thomas Baker <baker@sub.uni-goettingen.de>
- Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2007 08:59:36 +0200
- To: SWD Working Group <public-swd-wg@w3.org>
All, On yesterday's call [1], I took an action to post the emerging outline of the agenda for the meeting on 8-9 October in Amsterdam. We focused on Alistair's "three major issues" [2]. I have put a draft agenda on the wiki [3]. All, please feel free to add links, especially to additional issues relevant under specific agenda topics. Tom [1] http://www.w3.org/2007/08/21-swd-minutes.html [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2007Jun/0164.html [3] http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/wiki/AmsterdamAgenda --- = Agenda - Semantic Web Deployment WG face-to-face = 8-9 October, Amsterdam * This draft agenda: http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/wiki/AmsterdamAgenda * Registration: http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/39408/swd-ftf-adam-registration/ * Agenda and logistics: http://www.few.vu.nl/~aisaac/swd/ * Expected: Tom, Guus, Diego, Edsu, Justin, Antoine, Jon, Alistair, Ralph, Bernard, Sean = SKOS = General reading * http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/wiki/SKOS/Semantics * http://www.w3.org/TR/skos-ucr/ * http://www.w3.org/TR/swbp-skos-core-spec/ * http://www.w3.org/TR/swbp-skos-core-guide/ == Drawing the picture (discussion leader?) == Problems to discuss: * Are relationships part of a concept scheme? * Are the concepts part of a concept scheme? * Capture underlying intuitions: UML diagrams? Blobs and lines? * What do we mean by "containment", "aggregation"...? * Are relationships of a concept somehow part of the concept? * Can concepts "exist" independently of a scheme? * Goal: see how things fit together in the larger picture. Relevant issues: * ISSUE-36 http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/36 - ConceptSchemeContainment (open) Reading: * http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2007Aug/0016.html * http://isegserv.itd.rl.ac.uk/public/ajm65/dc2007/tutorial.pdf * http://zthes.z3950.org/model/zthes-model-1.0.html * bs8273 - UML diagrams available? * Elisa/Clay/Ed/Jon: OMG, ISO 1087...? == "Concept Semantics" (Antoine) == Problems to discuss: * Defining the semantics of skos:Concept * Mixing with OWL concepts Relevant issues: * ISSUE-54 http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/54 - ConceptSemantics (open) == "Labeling properties" (Alistair) == Problems to discuss: Relevant issues: * ISSUE-31 http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/31 - BasicLexicalLabelSemantics (open) == "Label relations" (Guus) == Problems to discuss: Relevant issues: * ISSUE-26 http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/26 - RelationshipsBetweenLabels (open) == "Semantic relation properties" (Sean) == Problems to discuss: * Transitivity Relevant issues: * ISSUE-44 http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/44 - BroaderNarrowerSemantics (open) == Vocabulary Management (Ralph locally, Elisa remotely) == To be discussed late afternoon Monday 16:00+ so that Elisa can join. Reading: * http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/wiki/VocabMgtDraft * http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-semweb-lifesci/2007Aug/0001.html * https://gnowsis.opendfki.de/repos/gnowsis/papers/2006_11_concepturi/html/index.html * http://esw.w3.org/topic/HCLSIG_BioRDF_Subgroup/Tasks/URI_Best_Practices * Daniel is liaison, SWD may be asked for review before publication * http://sites.wiwiss.fu-berlin.de/suhl/bizer/pub/drafts/LinkedDataTutorial/ == Other possible agenda items == * Recipes? * RDFa? == SKOS issues (as of 2007-08-21) == * Open * ISSUE-26 http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/26 - RelationshipsBetweenLabels (open) * ISSUE-27 http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/27 - AnnotationOnLabel (open) * ISSUE-31 http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/31 - BasicLexicalLabelSemantics (open) * ISSUE-36 http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/36 - ConceptSchemeContainment (open) * ISSUE-44 http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/44 - BroaderNarrowerSemantics (open) * ISSUE-54 http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/54 - ConceptSemantics (open) * Raised * ISSUE-32 http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/32 - ConceptSchemeLabellingInteractions (raised) * ISSUE-35 http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/35 - RulesAndConformance (raised) * ISSUE-37 http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/37 - SkosSpecialization (raised) * ISSUE-38 http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/38 - CompatibilityWithOWL-DL (raised) * ISSUE-39 http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/39 - ConceptualMappingLinks (raised) * ISSUE-40 http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/40 - ConceptCoordination (raised) * ISSUE-41 http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/41 - UseLangTagsInExamples (raised) * ISSUE-45 http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/45 - NaryLinksBetweenDescriptorsAndNonDescriptors (raised) * ISSUE-46 http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/46 - IndexingAndNonIndexingConcepts (raised) * ISSUE-47 http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/47 - MappingProvenanceInformation (raised) * ISSUE-48 http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/48 - IndexingRelationship (raised) * ISSUE-49 http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/49 - LexicalMappingLinks (raised) * ISSUE-50 http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/50 - CompatibilityWithDC (raised) * ISSUE-51 http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/51 - CompatibilityWithISO11179 (raised) * ISSUE-52 http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/52 - CompatibilityWithISO2788 (raised) * ISSUE-53 http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/53 - CompatibilityWithISO5964 (raised) * ISSUE-56 http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/56 - ReferenceSemanticRelationshipSpecializations (raised) -- Tom Baker - tbaker@tbaker.de - baker@sub.uni-goettingen.de
Received on Wednesday, 22 August 2007 07:01:54 UTC