- From: Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl>
- Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 17:00:09 +0200
- To: SWD WG <public-swd-wg@w3.org>
Hi Tom, I have linked this agenda from the logistics page. Which I hope is by the way now compliant with accessibility standards, even if I don't feel very proud of the result ;-) Antoine > All, > > On yesterday's call [1], I took an action to post the emerging > outline of the agenda for the meeting on 8-9 October in > Amsterdam. We focused on Alistair's "three major issues" [2]. > > I have put a draft agenda on the wiki [3]. All, please feel > free to add links, especially to additional issues relevant > under specific agenda topics. > > Tom > > [1] http://www.w3.org/2007/08/21-swd-minutes.html > [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2007Jun/0164.html > [3] http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/wiki/AmsterdamAgenda > > --- > > = Agenda - Semantic Web Deployment WG face-to-face = > 8-9 October, Amsterdam > > * This draft agenda: http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/wiki/AmsterdamAgenda > * Registration: http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/39408/swd-ftf-adam-registration/ > * Agenda and logistics: http://www.few.vu.nl/~aisaac/swd/ > * Expected: Tom, Guus, Diego, Edsu, Justin, Antoine, Jon, Alistair, Ralph, Bernard, Sean > > = SKOS = > > General reading > * http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/wiki/SKOS/Semantics > * http://www.w3.org/TR/skos-ucr/ > * http://www.w3.org/TR/swbp-skos-core-spec/ > * http://www.w3.org/TR/swbp-skos-core-guide/ > > == Drawing the picture (discussion leader?) == > > Problems to discuss: > * Are relationships part of a concept scheme? > * Are the concepts part of a concept scheme? > * Capture underlying intuitions: UML diagrams? Blobs and lines? > * What do we mean by "containment", "aggregation"...? > * Are relationships of a concept somehow part of the concept? > * Can concepts "exist" independently of a scheme? > * Goal: see how things fit together in the larger picture. > > Relevant issues: > * ISSUE-36 http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/36 - ConceptSchemeContainment (open) > > Reading: > * http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2007Aug/0016.html > * http://isegserv.itd.rl.ac.uk/public/ajm65/dc2007/tutorial.pdf > * http://zthes.z3950.org/model/zthes-model-1.0.html > * bs8273 - UML diagrams available? > * Elisa/Clay/Ed/Jon: OMG, ISO 1087...? > > == "Concept Semantics" (Antoine) == > > Problems to discuss: > * Defining the semantics of skos:Concept > * Mixing with OWL concepts > > Relevant issues: > * ISSUE-54 http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/54 - ConceptSemantics (open) > > == "Labeling properties" (Alistair) == > > Problems to discuss: > > Relevant issues: > * ISSUE-31 http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/31 - BasicLexicalLabelSemantics (open) > > == "Label relations" (Guus) == > > Problems to discuss: > > Relevant issues: > * ISSUE-26 http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/26 - RelationshipsBetweenLabels (open) > > == "Semantic relation properties" (Sean) == > > Problems to discuss: > * Transitivity > > Relevant issues: > * ISSUE-44 http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/44 - BroaderNarrowerSemantics (open) > > == Vocabulary Management (Ralph locally, Elisa remotely) == > > To be discussed late afternoon Monday 16:00+ so that Elisa can join. > > Reading: > * http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/wiki/VocabMgtDraft > * http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-semweb-lifesci/2007Aug/0001.html > * https://gnowsis.opendfki.de/repos/gnowsis/papers/2006_11_concepturi/html/index.html > * http://esw.w3.org/topic/HCLSIG_BioRDF_Subgroup/Tasks/URI_Best_Practices > * Daniel is liaison, SWD may be asked for review before publication > * http://sites.wiwiss.fu-berlin.de/suhl/bizer/pub/drafts/LinkedDataTutorial/ > > == Other possible agenda items == > > * Recipes? > * RDFa? > > == SKOS issues (as of 2007-08-21) == > > * Open > * ISSUE-26 http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/26 - RelationshipsBetweenLabels (open) > * ISSUE-27 http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/27 - AnnotationOnLabel (open) > * ISSUE-31 http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/31 - BasicLexicalLabelSemantics (open) > * ISSUE-36 http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/36 - ConceptSchemeContainment (open) > * ISSUE-44 http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/44 - BroaderNarrowerSemantics (open) > * ISSUE-54 http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/54 - ConceptSemantics (open) > * Raised > * ISSUE-32 http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/32 - ConceptSchemeLabellingInteractions (raised) > * ISSUE-35 http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/35 - RulesAndConformance (raised) > * ISSUE-37 http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/37 - SkosSpecialization (raised) > * ISSUE-38 http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/38 - CompatibilityWithOWL-DL (raised) > * ISSUE-39 http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/39 - ConceptualMappingLinks (raised) > * ISSUE-40 http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/40 - ConceptCoordination (raised) > * ISSUE-41 http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/41 - UseLangTagsInExamples (raised) > * ISSUE-45 http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/45 - NaryLinksBetweenDescriptorsAndNonDescriptors (raised) > * ISSUE-46 http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/46 - IndexingAndNonIndexingConcepts (raised) > * ISSUE-47 http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/47 - MappingProvenanceInformation (raised) > * ISSUE-48 http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/48 - IndexingRelationship (raised) > * ISSUE-49 http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/49 - LexicalMappingLinks (raised) > * ISSUE-50 http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/50 - CompatibilityWithDC (raised) > * ISSUE-51 http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/51 - CompatibilityWithISO11179 (raised) > * ISSUE-52 http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/52 - CompatibilityWithISO2788 (raised) > * ISSUE-53 http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/53 - CompatibilityWithISO5964 (raised) > * ISSUE-56 http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/56 - ReferenceSemanticRelationshipSpecializations (raised) > > >
Received on Monday, 27 August 2007 15:00:15 UTC