- From: Anthony Grasso <anthony.grasso@cisra.canon.com.au>
- Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2008 10:29:26 +1000
- To: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
- CC: public-svg-wg@w3.org
Hi Chris, Chris Lilley wrote: > Hello public-svg-wg, > > (This changed comes too late to be in todays published test suite but will be in the next one). > > I have updated text-align-202-t to fix some errors: > > - the test description said there were two subtests, but there were three > - the second subtest had the name "Egypt" (in Arabic) but it was spelled incorrectly so the test was misleading > - the test description has been improved and now says what all three test strings mean. > Excellent! > To allow comparison, I also duplicated this test as text-align-203-t, removed the svg font, and referred to platform fonts. I also changed the test description so the test can be passed if the fonts are not installed. When they are installed, its useful for developers to be able to look at this pair of tests. > > Lastly, since the image patch for text-align-202-t was a PNG, I replaced it with an SVG patch which renders correctly in Opera. However, its wrong in Batik. Should I commit a PNG made in Opera? > I'd say commit the PNG. The SVG image patch needs to render correctly in Batik otherwise we can't use it. > I also made an svg patch for text-align-203-t. This one is correct in both Opera and Batik. > Good work! > I was greatly helped in fixing this test by Shadi Abou-Zahra, a W3C staff member who reads and speaks Arabic. > Thanks, Anthony
Received on Saturday, 13 September 2008 00:30:08 UTC