Re: process request -- was: Using a Smart Client

On 03/08/2015 08:18 AM, henry.story@bblfish.net wrote:
> 
>> On 8 Mar 2015, at 02:56, Harry Halpin <hhalpin@w3.org> wrote:
>>
> 
> 
> On 03/07/2015 10:13 PM, ☮ elf Pavlik ☮ wrote:
>>>> On 03/07/2015 06:32 PM, henry.story@bblfish.net wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 7 Mar 2015, at 18:17, ☮ elf Pavlik ☮
>>>>>> <perpetual-tripper@wwelves.org> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 03/07/2015 06:05 PM, henry.story@bblfish.net wrote:
>>>>>>> [snip] Tanket wrote: " too much plumbing for v1." What is too
>>>>>>> much plumbing?
>>>>>> Henry, both Tantek and Aaron choose not to participate in this
>>>>>> mailing list, I recommend you discussing it with them over IRC
>>>>>>
>>>>>> you can lave messages there using !tell e.g. !tell tantek let's
>>>>>> talk about Using a Smart Client
>>>>>
>>>>> ?!?
>>>>>
>>>>> Sorry but participation in W3C WG requires all members to use the
>>>>> same mailing list. We can't just work over 20 different channels.
>>>>> What is written elsewhere, is not archived by the W3C and so has
>>>>> no weight in the process.
>>>> You could also meet on IRC and even use one time call bridge 
>>>> https://www.w3.org/wiki/Socialig#Instructions_for_creating_a_one-time_call_bridge
>>>>
>>>> AFAIK you can invite RRSAgent any time to #social IRC channel and
>>>> it will log the conversation http://www.w3.org/2002/03/RRSAgent
>>>>
>>>> Henry, I can understand your frustration but also please understand
>>>> that Tantek, Aaron and other IndieWeb folks find mailing lists
>>>> unproductive and draining energy. IMO we don't have 20 but just 4
>>>> official channels: mailing-list, wiki, IRC, tracker + telecons
>>>> which gives us enough flexibility to not force others to do
>>>> something they really don't want to do. And I know that you use IRC
>>>> anyways :)
>>>>
>>>> BTW on #indiewebcamp IRC i see Postel's law mentioned pretty often 
>>>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robustness_principle "Be conservative
>>>> in what you send, be liberal in what you accept"
>>>>
>>>> Cheers!
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I'd like clarification on process from the W3C
> 
> They are subscribed to the mailing list and attend calls. However, I
> don't think there's any part of W3C process that requires WG members
> to respond to every email they get. I suggest that you try to chat
> with them over IRC as well, and we can raise this issue on the next
> telecon.
> 
>> Fine for raising it at the next teleconf. 
added to
https://www.w3.org/wiki/Socialwg/2015-03-10#Additional_Agenda_Items