W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-socialweb@w3.org > April 2015

Re: Regular weekly meeting 7 Apr 2015

From: Christopher Allan Webber <cwebber@dustycloud.org>
Date: Tue, 07 Apr 2015 09:33:14 -0500
To: Evan Prodromou <evan@e14n.com>
Cc: "public-socialweb\@w3.org" <public-socialweb@w3.org>
Message-ID: <87bnj0roo1.fsf@earlgrey.lan>
Yeah, I do think being able to bring up issues before a meeting is a
good idea... the problem we've had in the meetings is not certain
agenda items being added at last minute, but spending a ton of time
iterating through the issue list.  So I don't agree, but I appreciate
elf trying to find ways to deal with the slow movement in the group.

Here's a suggestion: how about we always deal with the general issue
list *last* on the call?  If people have specific issues they want
raised, they can put them on the agenda, but then walking through the
open issues and attempting to close them out can happen at the end.
This way if people want to raise important things to be discussed with
the group, that's not lost, and there's still time to go through the
issue list.  (Especially if the call is now 90 minutes long...)

 - Chris

Evan Prodromou writes:

> Thanks for the recommendation, but I'm not in favour of freezing the 
> agenda on the previous Friday.
>
> -Evan
>
> On 2015-04-07 08:27 AM, ☮ elf Pavlik ☮ wrote:
>> On 04/06/2015 10:47 PM, Arnaud Le Hors wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> I put a couple of proposals regarding the disposition of AS related issues
>>> into the agenda. I think we can take care of a bunch of issues with two
>>> simple votes up or down. If a proposal doesn't fly as is we should remove
>>> the controversial ones from the list and make a new proposal.
>>>
>>> Hopefully we can get some progress quickly that way and spend our valuable
>>> time to discussion on how to resolve issues. I've had success with this
>>> approach in other WGs so I hope it works here too.
>>>
>>> Regards.
>> Thanks Arnaud!
>>
>> I just moved much older issues, whici I proposed to agenda already over
>> a week ago to the top. Many of raised issues IMO depend them (ISSUE-16
>> and ISSUE-36) and discussing it first may save us similar back and forth
>> experience as we had last week. I also made sure that Erik will
>> participate in today's call before adding them to agenda.
>> https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-socialweb/2015Mar/0208.html
>>
>> If you feel strongly that we should keep the order you put, please feel
>> free to simply revert my change.
>>
>> Workflow proposal of freezing agenda on the Friday before the meeting
>> will save us in a future such last minute maneuvers.
>> https://www.w3.org/wiki/Socialwg/2015-04-07#Closing_WG_agenda_on_Friday
>>
>> Cheers!
>>
Received on Tuesday, 7 April 2015 14:35:42 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:26:16 UTC