W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-socialweb@w3.org > April 2015

Re: Regular weekly meeting 7 Apr 2015

From: ☮ elf Pavlik ☮ <perpetual-tripper@wwelves.org>
Date: Tue, 07 Apr 2015 16:28:43 +0200
Message-ID: <5523E99B.50500@wwelves.org>
To: Arnaud Le Hors <lehors@us.ibm.com>
CC: Evan Prodromou <evan@e14n.com>, public-socialweb@w3.org
On 04/07/2015 04:21 PM, Arnaud Le Hors wrote:
> The reason I put them before yours was because I don't want to spend time 
> discussing them - I just want a quick vote on them, especially to open the 
> raised issues - while I expect yours to require discussion.
Can we than put *hard* time limit of max 20min on this open/close procedure?
I have impression that last two meetings we pretty much spent fiddling
with a tracker while we have some pretty fundamental issues (like
ISSUE-16) to work on. As I said, please feel free to revert my last
change to the agenda wiki page!


> --
> Arnaud  Le Hors - Senior Technical Staff Member, Open Web Technologies - 
> IBM Software Group
> 
> 
> ☮ elf Pavlik ☮ <perpetual-tripper@wwelves.org> wrote on 04/07/2015 
> 05:27:39 AM:
> 
>> From: ☮ elf Pavlik ☮ <perpetual-tripper@wwelves.org>
>> To: Arnaud Le Hors/Cupertino/IBM@IBMUS, public-socialweb@w3.org
>> Cc: Evan Prodromou <evan@e14n.com>
>> Date: 04/07/2015 05:28 AM
>> Subject: Re: Regular weekly meeting 7 Apr 2015
>>
>> On 04/06/2015 10:47 PM, Arnaud Le Hors wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> I put a couple of proposals regarding the disposition of AS related 
> issues 
>>> into the agenda. I think we can take care of a bunch of issues with 
> two 
>>> simple votes up or down. If a proposal doesn't fly as is we should 
> remove 
>>> the controversial ones from the list and make a new proposal.
>>>
>>> Hopefully we can get some progress quickly that way and spend our 
> valuable 
>>> time to discussion on how to resolve issues. I've had success with 
> this 
>>> approach in other WGs so I hope it works here too.
>>>
>>> Regards.
>> Thanks Arnaud!
>>
>> I just moved much older issues, whici I proposed to agenda already over
>> a week ago to the top. Many of raised issues IMO depend them (ISSUE-16
>> and ISSUE-36) and discussing it first may save us similar back and forth
>> experience as we had last week. I also made sure that Erik will
>> participate in today's call before adding them to agenda.
>> https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-socialweb/2015Mar/0208.html
>>
>> If you feel strongly that we should keep the order you put, please feel
>> free to simply revert my change.
>>
>> Workflow proposal of freezing agenda on the Friday before the meeting
>> will save us in a future such last minute maneuvers.
>> https://www.w3.org/wiki/Socialwg/2015-04-07#Closing_WG_agenda_on_Friday
>>
>> Cheers!
>>
>> [attachment "signature.asc" deleted by Arnaud Le Hors/Cupertino/IBM] 



Received on Tuesday, 7 April 2015 14:28:59 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:26:16 UTC