- From: Evan Prodromou <evan@e14n.com>
- Date: Tue, 07 Apr 2015 09:43:48 -0400
- To: "public-socialweb@w3.org" <public-socialweb@w3.org>
Thanks for the recommendation, but I'm not in favour of freezing the agenda on the previous Friday. -Evan On 2015-04-07 08:27 AM, ☮ elf Pavlik ☮ wrote: > On 04/06/2015 10:47 PM, Arnaud Le Hors wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> I put a couple of proposals regarding the disposition of AS related issues >> into the agenda. I think we can take care of a bunch of issues with two >> simple votes up or down. If a proposal doesn't fly as is we should remove >> the controversial ones from the list and make a new proposal. >> >> Hopefully we can get some progress quickly that way and spend our valuable >> time to discussion on how to resolve issues. I've had success with this >> approach in other WGs so I hope it works here too. >> >> Regards. > Thanks Arnaud! > > I just moved much older issues, whici I proposed to agenda already over > a week ago to the top. Many of raised issues IMO depend them (ISSUE-16 > and ISSUE-36) and discussing it first may save us similar back and forth > experience as we had last week. I also made sure that Erik will > participate in today's call before adding them to agenda. > https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-socialweb/2015Mar/0208.html > > If you feel strongly that we should keep the order you put, please feel > free to simply revert my change. > > Workflow proposal of freezing agenda on the Friday before the meeting > will save us in a future such last minute maneuvers. > https://www.w3.org/wiki/Socialwg/2015-04-07#Closing_WG_agenda_on_Friday > > Cheers! >
Received on Tuesday, 7 April 2015 13:44:11 UTC