W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-socialweb@w3.org > April 2015

Re: Regular weekly meeting 7 Apr 2015

From: Arnaud Le Hors <lehors@us.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2015 07:21:03 -0700
To: ☮ elf Pavlik ☮ <perpetual-tripper@wwelves.org>
Cc: Evan Prodromou <evan@e14n.com>, public-socialweb@w3.org
Message-ID: <OF6F5E5FDB.8BFE776C-ON88257E20.004E1E63-88257E20.004ED551@us.ibm.com>
The reason I put them before yours was because I don't want to spend time 
discussing them - I just want a quick vote on them, especially to open the 
raised issues - while I expect yours to require discussion.
--
Arnaud  Le Hors - Senior Technical Staff Member, Open Web Technologies - 
IBM Software Group


☮ elf Pavlik ☮ <perpetual-tripper@wwelves.org> wrote on 04/07/2015 
05:27:39 AM:

> From: ☮ elf Pavlik ☮ <perpetual-tripper@wwelves.org>
> To: Arnaud Le Hors/Cupertino/IBM@IBMUS, public-socialweb@w3.org
> Cc: Evan Prodromou <evan@e14n.com>
> Date: 04/07/2015 05:28 AM
> Subject: Re: Regular weekly meeting 7 Apr 2015
> 
> On 04/06/2015 10:47 PM, Arnaud Le Hors wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > 
> > I put a couple of proposals regarding the disposition of AS related 
issues 
> > into the agenda. I think we can take care of a bunch of issues with 
two 
> > simple votes up or down. If a proposal doesn't fly as is we should 
remove 
> > the controversial ones from the list and make a new proposal.
> > 
> > Hopefully we can get some progress quickly that way and spend our 
valuable 
> > time to discussion on how to resolve issues. I've had success with 
this 
> > approach in other WGs so I hope it works here too.
> > 
> > Regards.
> Thanks Arnaud!
> 
> I just moved much older issues, whici I proposed to agenda already over
> a week ago to the top. Many of raised issues IMO depend them (ISSUE-16
> and ISSUE-36) and discussing it first may save us similar back and forth
> experience as we had last week. I also made sure that Erik will
> participate in today's call before adding them to agenda.
> https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-socialweb/2015Mar/0208.html

> 
> If you feel strongly that we should keep the order you put, please feel
> free to simply revert my change.
> 
> Workflow proposal of freezing agenda on the Friday before the meeting
> will save us in a future such last minute maneuvers.
> https://www.w3.org/wiki/Socialwg/2015-04-07#Closing_WG_agenda_on_Friday

> 
> Cheers!
> 
> [attachment "signature.asc" deleted by Arnaud Le Hors/Cupertino/IBM] 
Received on Tuesday, 7 April 2015 14:21:42 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:26:16 UTC