- From: Arnaud Le Hors <lehors@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2015 07:21:03 -0700
- To: ☮ elf Pavlik ☮ <perpetual-tripper@wwelves.org>
- Cc: Evan Prodromou <evan@e14n.com>, public-socialweb@w3.org
- Message-ID: <OF6F5E5FDB.8BFE776C-ON88257E20.004E1E63-88257E20.004ED551@us.ibm.com>
The reason I put them before yours was because I don't want to spend time discussing them - I just want a quick vote on them, especially to open the raised issues - while I expect yours to require discussion. -- Arnaud Le Hors - Senior Technical Staff Member, Open Web Technologies - IBM Software Group ☮ elf Pavlik ☮ <perpetual-tripper@wwelves.org> wrote on 04/07/2015 05:27:39 AM: > From: ☮ elf Pavlik ☮ <perpetual-tripper@wwelves.org> > To: Arnaud Le Hors/Cupertino/IBM@IBMUS, public-socialweb@w3.org > Cc: Evan Prodromou <evan@e14n.com> > Date: 04/07/2015 05:28 AM > Subject: Re: Regular weekly meeting 7 Apr 2015 > > On 04/06/2015 10:47 PM, Arnaud Le Hors wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > I put a couple of proposals regarding the disposition of AS related issues > > into the agenda. I think we can take care of a bunch of issues with two > > simple votes up or down. If a proposal doesn't fly as is we should remove > > the controversial ones from the list and make a new proposal. > > > > Hopefully we can get some progress quickly that way and spend our valuable > > time to discussion on how to resolve issues. I've had success with this > > approach in other WGs so I hope it works here too. > > > > Regards. > Thanks Arnaud! > > I just moved much older issues, whici I proposed to agenda already over > a week ago to the top. Many of raised issues IMO depend them (ISSUE-16 > and ISSUE-36) and discussing it first may save us similar back and forth > experience as we had last week. I also made sure that Erik will > participate in today's call before adding them to agenda. > https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-socialweb/2015Mar/0208.html > > If you feel strongly that we should keep the order you put, please feel > free to simply revert my change. > > Workflow proposal of freezing agenda on the Friday before the meeting > will save us in a future such last minute maneuvers. > https://www.w3.org/wiki/Socialwg/2015-04-07#Closing_WG_agenda_on_Friday > > Cheers! > > [attachment "signature.asc" deleted by Arnaud Le Hors/Cupertino/IBM]
Received on Tuesday, 7 April 2015 14:21:42 UTC