W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-shex@w3.org > May 2017

RE: proposal to amend acceptance of shacl compact syntax

From: Svensson, Lars <L.Svensson@dnb.de>
Date: Wed, 31 May 2017 15:07:16 +0000
To: Andra Waagmeester <andra@micelio.be>, Thomas Baker <tom@tombaker.org>
CC: Eric Prud'hommeaux <eric@w3.org>, "public-shex@w3.org" <public-shex@w3.org>
Message-ID: <24637769D123E644A105A0AF0E1F92EF010D2DDAC9@dnbf-ex1.AD.DDB.DE>
On Wednesday, May 31, 2017 1:55 PM, Andra Waagmeester [mailto:andra@micelio.be] wrote:

> On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 9:43 AM, Thomas Baker <tom@tombaker.org> wrote:
> On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 06:16:10PM -0400, Eric Prudhommeaux wrote:
> > Hi gang, on Friday, we agreed with Sandro's proposal that the keyword
> > "SHACL" discriminate SHACL compact syntax from ShEx. Holger counter-
> > proposed either "shapeClass" or "shape". Speaking to a few of you, it
> > seems that "shape" serves only to muddy the waters as it is part of
> > both languages (with different meanings). I expect we can all agree
> > with Holger's proposal that SHACL compact syntax discriminate itself
> > with the use of the keyword "shapeClass".
> >
> > PROPOSE: accept publication of the SHACL compact syntax with SHACL
> > shape classes prefixed with the keyword "shapeClass".
> >
> > ericP: +1
> 
> Tom +1

LarsG +1

Received on Wednesday, 31 May 2017 15:07:54 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 31 May 2017 15:07:55 UTC