W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-shex@w3.org > May 2017

RE: proposal to amend acceptance of shacl compact syntax

From: Thornton, Katherine <katherine.thornton@yale.edu>
Date: Wed, 31 May 2017 11:43:46 +0000
To: ShEx Public W3C- CG <public-shex@w3.org>
Message-ID: <BN6PR08MB2498B70CC21F6FB330E28BC9E6F10@BN6PR08MB2498.namprd08.prod.outlook.com>


-----Original Message-----
From: David Booth [mailto:david@dbooth.org] 
Sent: Wednesday, May 31, 2017 7:03 AM
To: public-shex@w3.org
Subject: Re: proposal to amend acceptance of shacl compact syntax

On 05/30/2017 07:10 PM, Gregg Kellogg wrote:
>> On May 30, 2017, at 3:16 PM, Eric Prud'hommeaux <eric@w3.org> wrote:
>>
>> Hi gang, on Friday, we agreed with Sandro's proposal that the keyword 
>> "SHACL" discriminate SHACL compact syntax from ShEx. Holger counter- 
>> proposed either "shapeClass" or "shape". Speaking to a few of you, it 
>> seems that "shape" serves only to muddy the waters as it is part of 
>> both languages (with different meanings). I expect we can all agree 
>> with Holger's proposal that SHACL compact syntax discriminate itself 
>> with the use of the keyword "shapeClass".
>>
>> PROPOSE: accept publication of the SHACL compact syntax with SHACL 
>> shape classes prefixed with the keyword "shapeClass".
>>
>> ericP: +1
> 
> gkellogg: +1

dbooth +1

kthornt +1
Received on Wednesday, 31 May 2017 11:44:21 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 31 May 2017 11:44:22 UTC