RE: proposal to amend acceptance of shacl compact syntax

hsolbrig: +1
________________________________________
From: Eric Prud'hommeaux [eric@w3.org]
Sent: Tuesday, May 30, 2017 5:16 PM
To: public-shex@w3.org
Subject: proposal to amend acceptance of shacl compact syntax

Hi gang, on Friday, we agreed with Sandro's proposal that the keyword
"SHACL" discriminate SHACL compact syntax from ShEx. Holger counter-
proposed either "shapeClass" or "shape". Speaking to a few of you, it
seems that "shape" serves only to muddy the waters as it is part of
both languages (with different meanings). I expect we can all agree
with Holger's proposal that SHACL compact syntax discriminate itself
with the use of the keyword "shapeClass".

PROPOSE: accept publication of the SHACL compact syntax with SHACL
shape classes prefixed with the keyword "shapeClass".

ericP: +1

--
-ericP

office: +1.617.599.3509
mobile: +33.6.80.80.35.59

(eric@w3.org)
Feel free to forward this message to any list for any purpose other than
email address distribution.

There are subtle nuances encoded in font variation and clever layout
which can only be seen by printing this message on high-clay paper.

Received on Tuesday, 30 May 2017 22:40:43 UTC