No problem, Jeremy. That approach is fine with me :) Clemens Am 03.05.2017 um 14:19 schrieb Jeremy Tandy <jeremy.tandy@gmail.com<mailto:jeremy.tandy@gmail.com>>: Hi Clemens- sorry about that. We just read the title, saw "API" and thought of you. I've read through the email thread and see that there is no action to be taken for SDWBP. Thanks for flagging this so quickly. Jeremy On Wed, 3 May 2017 at 10:37 Clemens Portele <portele@interactive-instruments.de<mailto:portele@interactive-instruments.de>> wrote: Hi both, could you clarify what the outstanding public comment is. In the thread I see a discussion that led to an update of the DWBP and which we reference explicitly. What is still open? Thanks, Clemens On 3 May 2017 at 11:01, Jeremy Tandy <jeremy.tandy@gmail.com<mailto:jeremy.tandy@gmail.com>> wrote: Hi Clemens - on the detailed planning page [1] there's a outstanding public comment about the API Best Practice. Could you please check that we have covered the concerns raised - or that the submitter of these comments is content with the how the BP is currently written. Many thanks, Jeremy & Linda [1]: https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/wiki/Detailed_planning_BP_document#Outstanding_public_comments
Received on Wednesday, 3 May 2017 14:27:35 UTC