Re: final version of coverage docs - advice on process?

Thanks Francois!  I'll do that, and will take a look at those QB4ST issues



On 27 June 2017 at 08:37, Francois Daoust <fd@w3.org> wrote:

> Hi Bill,
>
>
>
> Yes, please initiate a call for consensus on the mailing-list for the
> publication of coverage JSON doc as final Working Group Note next week.
> That call should last 5 working days, so you can put 4 July as an end date
> if the message gets out today. Actual publication would typically happen on
> Thursday, July 6th.
>
>
>
> There is one pending pull request from me on the QB4ST document that
> improves the layout of the examples and ontology excerpts:
>
> https://github.com/w3c/sdw/pull/932
>
>
>
> There is also a related discussion with a suggestion to make the
> “Vocabulary Reference” section explicit about the fact that the normative
> definition of the ontology is the ontology file, see:
>
> https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-sdw-wg/2017Jun/0080.html
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Francois.
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Bill Roberts [mailto:bill@swirrl.com]
> *Sent:* Tuesday, June 27, 2017 8:19 AM
> *To:* Francois Daoust <fd@w3.org>; Jon Blower <j.d.blower@reading.ac.uk>;
> public-sdw-wg@w3.org
> *Subject:* final version of coverage docs - advice on process?
>
>
>
> Hi Francois
>
>
>
> We have now addressed all the remaining issues on the coverage json doc in
> the latest editor's draft: http://w3c.github.io/sdw/coverage-json/
>
>
>
> Should I initiate a vote via the mailing list to agree the publishing of
> this?
>
>
>
> Anything else we need to do on it?
>
>
>
> The same will apply for EO-QB and QB4ST docs. I'll check today whether
> there are any final things to do on those.
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
>
>
> Bill
>