- From: Rob Atkinson <rob@metalinkage.com.au>
- Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2017 14:06:08 +0000
- To: Bill Roberts <bill@swirrl.com>, Francois Daoust <fd@w3.org>
- Cc: Jon Blower <j.d.blower@reading.ac.uk>, "public-sdw-wg@w3.org" <public-sdw-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CACfF9LynphV-tEG1C5rZvZEow5nCr34smF4j+v+vUnwQWKvzEA@mail.gmail.com>
Is is possible to get a small slide set to state the scope and status of Coverages-json and eo4qb - or else i'll have to make something up for tomorrow morning OGC report back and may miss key messages. Cheers Rob On Tue, 27 Jun 2017 at 17:09 Bill Roberts <bill@swirrl.com> wrote: > Thanks Francois! I'll do that, and will take a look at those QB4ST issues > > > > On 27 June 2017 at 08:37, Francois Daoust <fd@w3.org> wrote: > >> Hi Bill, >> >> >> >> Yes, please initiate a call for consensus on the mailing-list for the >> publication of coverage JSON doc as final Working Group Note next week. >> That call should last 5 working days, so you can put 4 July as an end date >> if the message gets out today. Actual publication would typically happen on >> Thursday, July 6th. >> >> >> >> There is one pending pull request from me on the QB4ST document that >> improves the layout of the examples and ontology excerpts: >> >> https://github.com/w3c/sdw/pull/932 >> >> >> >> There is also a related discussion with a suggestion to make the >> “Vocabulary Reference” section explicit about the fact that the normative >> definition of the ontology is the ontology file, see: >> >> https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-sdw-wg/2017Jun/0080.html >> >> >> >> Thanks, >> >> Francois. >> >> >> >> >> >> *From:* Bill Roberts [mailto:bill@swirrl.com] >> *Sent:* Tuesday, June 27, 2017 8:19 AM >> *To:* Francois Daoust <fd@w3.org>; Jon Blower <j.d.blower@reading.ac.uk>; >> public-sdw-wg@w3.org >> *Subject:* final version of coverage docs - advice on process? >> >> >> >> Hi Francois >> >> >> >> We have now addressed all the remaining issues on the coverage json doc >> in the latest editor's draft: http://w3c.github.io/sdw/coverage-json/ >> >> >> >> Should I initiate a vote via the mailing list to agree the publishing of >> this? >> >> >> >> Anything else we need to do on it? >> >> >> >> The same will apply for EO-QB and QB4ST docs. I'll check today whether >> there are any final things to do on those. >> >> >> >> Thanks >> >> >> >> Bill >> > >
Received on Wednesday, 28 June 2017 14:06:58 UTC