W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-sdw-wg@w3.org > June 2017

RE: final version of coverage docs - advice on process?

From: Francois Daoust <fd@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2017 08:37:47 +0200
To: "'Bill Roberts'" <bill@swirrl.com>, "'Jon Blower'" <j.d.blower@reading.ac.uk>, <public-sdw-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <023e01d2ef0f$e4432800$acc97800$@w3.org>
Hi Bill,
 
Yes, please initiate a call for consensus on the mailing-list for the publication of coverage JSON doc as final Working Group Note next week. That call should last 5 working days, so you can put 4 July as an end date if the message gets out today. Actual publication would typically happen on Thursday, July 6th.
 
There is one pending pull request from me on the QB4ST document that improves the layout of the examples and ontology excerpts:
 <https://github.com/w3c/sdw/pull/932> https://github.com/w3c/sdw/pull/932
 
There is also a related discussion with a suggestion to make the “Vocabulary Reference” section explicit about the fact that the normative definition of the ontology is the ontology file, see:
 <https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-sdw-wg/2017Jun/0080.html> https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-sdw-wg/2017Jun/0080.html
 
Thanks,
Francois.
 
 
From: Bill Roberts [mailto:bill@swirrl.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 27, 2017 8:19 AM
To: Francois Daoust <fd@w3.org>; Jon Blower <j.d.blower@reading.ac.uk>; public-sdw-wg@w3.org
Subject: final version of coverage docs - advice on process?
 
Hi Francois
 
We have now addressed all the remaining issues on the coverage json doc in the latest editor's draft: http://w3c.github.io/sdw/coverage-json/
 
Should I initiate a vote via the mailing list to agree the publishing of this?
 
Anything else we need to do on it?
 
The same will apply for EO-QB and QB4ST docs. I'll check today whether there are any final things to do on those.
 
Thanks
 
Bill
Received on Tuesday, 27 June 2017 06:38:01 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 24 March 2022 20:31:33 UTC