Re: Best Practice priorities for next WD release

Sorry Jeremy, I will not be able to make the plenary call next week,
hopefully Clemens is able to..

Ed


On Wed, 12 Oct 2016 at 17:31 Jeremy Tandy <jeremy.tandy@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi all-
>
> We BP editors are planning to adopt a regular release cycle for the BP doc
> with a new WD every 4-6 weeks - beginning after the vote to release another
> WD next week.
>
> We plan to operate it like a sprint, with particular priorities identified
> for the coming release.
>
> At our sub-group call today (minutes [1]) we agreed that the priorities
> for the _next_ WD (that's the one after the pending release that you'll
> vote on next week):
>
> * Address insights arising from the INSPIRE 2016 sdw workshop (Ed, Clemens
> - we're keen to hear your feedback at next week's plenary)
> * Add consistent ‘running’ examples to best practices … @andreaperego
> suggests a “call for examples”
> * Continue development of §10 “How to use these best practices”
> <http://w3c.github.io/sdw/bp/#how-to-use>
> * Amend best practices in light of “time-boxed discussion of picked BPs”
> at TPAC
>   - BP number 7: Use globally unique HTTP identifiers for spatial things
> <http://w3c.github.io/sdw/bp/#globally-unique-ids>
>   - BP number 4: Make your data indexable by search engines
> <http://w3c.github.io/sdw/bp/#indexable-by-search-engines>
>
> That might be too much to fit. And doesn't reflect the potential for new
> issues arising from public comment.
>
> Let me know if you object to these priorities ...
>
> Jeremy
>
> [1]: http://www.w3.org/2016/10/12-sdwbp-minutes.html
>
-- 

*Ed Parsons *FRGS
Geospatial Technologist, Google

Google Voice +44 (0)20 7881 4501
www.edparsons.com @edparsons