W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-sdw-wg@w3.org > October 2016

Re: Best Practice priorities for next WD release

From: Clemens Portele <portele@interactive-instruments.de>
Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2016 14:16:31 +0000
To: Ed Parsons <eparsons@google.com>
CC: Jeremy Tandy <jeremy.tandy@gmail.com>, SDW WG Public List <public-sdw-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <9A1247A1-5D3B-4EEA-8D42-87E521DE477B@interactive-instruments.de>
That is now 20:00 UTC, correct?

In that case I will also have to send my regrets due to a conflict (private event). However, I probably could only summarize what I have written down in the notes that I had sent to the list. I will have a look at them again early next week and sent input by email, if I think there are items that should be discussed in the first sprint. Would that work?

Also, for the record: I support the release of the next BP WD.

Best regards,

On 13 Oct 2016, at 15:57, Ed Parsons <eparsons@google.com<mailto:eparsons@google.com>> wrote:

Sorry Jeremy, I will not be able to make the plenary call next week, hopefully Clemens is able to..


On Wed, 12 Oct 2016 at 17:31 Jeremy Tandy <jeremy.tandy@gmail.com<mailto:jeremy.tandy@gmail.com>> wrote:
Hi all-

We BP editors are planning to adopt a regular release cycle for the BP doc with a new WD every 4-6 weeks - beginning after the vote to release another WD next week.

We plan to operate it like a sprint, with particular priorities identified for the coming release.

At our sub-group call today (minutes [1]) we agreed that the priorities for the _next_ WD (that's the one after the pending release that you'll vote on next week):

* Address insights arising from the INSPIRE 2016 sdw workshop (Ed, Clemens - we're keen to hear your feedback at next week's plenary)
* Add consistent ‘running’ examples to best practices … @andreaperego suggests a “call for examples”
* Continue development of §10 “How to use these best practices”<http://w3c.github.io/sdw/bp/#how-to-use>
* Amend best practices in light of “time-boxed discussion of picked BPs” at TPAC
  - BP number 7: Use globally unique HTTP identifiers for spatial things<http://w3c.github.io/sdw/bp/#globally-unique-ids>
  - BP number 4: Make your data indexable by search engines<http://w3c.github.io/sdw/bp/#indexable-by-search-engines>

That might be too much to fit. And doesn't reflect the potential for new issues arising from public comment.

Let me know if you object to these priorities ...


[1]: http://www.w3.org/2016/10/12-sdwbp-minutes.html


Ed Parsons FRGS
Geospatial Technologist, Google

Google Voice +44 (0)20 7881 4501<tel:%2B44%20%280%2920%207881%204501>
www.edparsons.com<http://www.edparsons.com/> @edparsons

Received on Thursday, 13 October 2016 14:17:10 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 13 October 2016 14:17:11 UTC