Re: Best Practice priorities for next WD release

Ok. Can you register your vote to approve (or not) the release of the next
BP WD by correspondence? Thanks
On Thu, 13 Oct 2016 at 14:57, Ed Parsons <eparsons@google.com> wrote:

> Sorry Jeremy, I will not be able to make the plenary call next week,
> hopefully Clemens is able to..
>
> Ed
>
>
> On Wed, 12 Oct 2016 at 17:31 Jeremy Tandy <jeremy.tandy@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi all-
>
> We BP editors are planning to adopt a regular release cycle for the BP doc
> with a new WD every 4-6 weeks - beginning after the vote to release another
> WD next week.
>
> We plan to operate it like a sprint, with particular priorities identified
> for the coming release.
>
> At our sub-group call today (minutes [1]) we agreed that the priorities
> for the _next_ WD (that's the one after the pending release that you'll
> vote on next week):
>
> * Address insights arising from the INSPIRE 2016 sdw workshop (Ed, Clemens
> - we're keen to hear your feedback at next week's plenary)
> * Add consistent ‘running’ examples to best practices … @andreaperego
> suggests a “call for examples”
> * Continue development of §10 “How to use these best practices”
> <http://w3c.github.io/sdw/bp/#how-to-use>
> * Amend best practices in light of “time-boxed discussion of picked BPs”
> at TPAC
>   - BP number 7: Use globally unique HTTP identifiers for spatial things
> <http://w3c.github.io/sdw/bp/#globally-unique-ids>
>   - BP number 4: Make your data indexable by search engines
> <http://w3c.github.io/sdw/bp/#indexable-by-search-engines>
>
> That might be too much to fit. And doesn't reflect the potential for new
> issues arising from public comment.
>
> Let me know if you object to these priorities ...
>
> Jeremy
>
> [1]: http://www.w3.org/2016/10/12-sdwbp-minutes.html
>
> --
>
> *Ed Parsons *FRGS
> Geospatial Technologist, Google
>
> Google Voice +44 (0)20 7881 4501
> www.edparsons.com @edparsons
>