W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-sdw-wg@w3.org > October 2016

Best Practice priorities for next WD release

From: Jeremy Tandy <jeremy.tandy@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2016 16:30:07 +0000
Message-ID: <CADtUq_32ZEYj5CpyJmea8xr29u-WDJSpGeQbh3QSk=Ygz7fXNw@mail.gmail.com>
To: SDW WG Public List <public-sdw-wg@w3.org>
Hi all-

We BP editors are planning to adopt a regular release cycle for the BP doc
with a new WD every 4-6 weeks - beginning after the vote to release another
WD next week.

We plan to operate it like a sprint, with particular priorities identified
for the coming release.

At our sub-group call today (minutes [1]) we agreed that the priorities for
the _next_ WD (that's the one after the pending release that you'll vote on
next week):

* Address insights arising from the INSPIRE 2016 sdw workshop (Ed, Clemens
- we're keen to hear your feedback at next week's plenary)
* Add consistent ‘running’ examples to best practices … @andreaperego
suggests a “call for examples”
* Continue development of §10 “How to use these best practices”
<http://w3c.github.io/sdw/bp/#how-to-use>
* Amend best practices in light of “time-boxed discussion of picked BPs” at
TPAC
  - BP number 7: Use globally unique HTTP identifiers for spatial things
<http://w3c.github.io/sdw/bp/#globally-unique-ids>
  - BP number 4: Make your data indexable by search engines
<http://w3c.github.io/sdw/bp/#indexable-by-search-engines>

That might be too much to fit. And doesn't reflect the potential for new
issues arising from public comment.

Let me know if you object to these priorities ...

Jeremy

[1]: http://www.w3.org/2016/10/12-sdwbp-minutes.html
Received on Wednesday, 12 October 2016 16:30:47 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 12 October 2016 16:30:47 UTC