- From: Jeremy Tandy <jeremy.tandy@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2016 16:30:07 +0000
- To: SDW WG Public List <public-sdw-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CADtUq_32ZEYj5CpyJmea8xr29u-WDJSpGeQbh3QSk=Ygz7fXNw@mail.gmail.com>
Hi all- We BP editors are planning to adopt a regular release cycle for the BP doc with a new WD every 4-6 weeks - beginning after the vote to release another WD next week. We plan to operate it like a sprint, with particular priorities identified for the coming release. At our sub-group call today (minutes [1]) we agreed that the priorities for the _next_ WD (that's the one after the pending release that you'll vote on next week): * Address insights arising from the INSPIRE 2016 sdw workshop (Ed, Clemens - we're keen to hear your feedback at next week's plenary) * Add consistent ‘running’ examples to best practices … @andreaperego suggests a “call for examples” * Continue development of §10 “How to use these best practices” <http://w3c.github.io/sdw/bp/#how-to-use> * Amend best practices in light of “time-boxed discussion of picked BPs” at TPAC - BP number 7: Use globally unique HTTP identifiers for spatial things <http://w3c.github.io/sdw/bp/#globally-unique-ids> - BP number 4: Make your data indexable by search engines <http://w3c.github.io/sdw/bp/#indexable-by-search-engines> That might be too much to fit. And doesn't reflect the potential for new issues arising from public comment. Let me know if you object to these priorities ... Jeremy [1]: http://www.w3.org/2016/10/12-sdwbp-minutes.html
Received on Wednesday, 12 October 2016 16:30:47 UTC