RE: multilinguality

Frans,
Suits me!
Kerry

From: Frans Knibbe [mailto:frans.knibbe@geodan.nl]
Sent: Wednesday, 13 May 2015 10:16 PM
To: Taylor, Kerry (Digital, Acton)
Cc: Alejandro Llaves; SDW WG Public List
Subject: Re: multilinguality

Hello Kerry,

We could say that we want ontologies that have something to do with our domain (spatiotermporal data) to be multilingual. Although it is a general good practice for any ontology, we could make it an explicit requirement for the ontologies that are going to be addressed by the Working Group. If put this way (spatiotemporal vocabularies should have multilingual annotation), I think the requirement can be considered in scope.

Regards,
Frans

2015-05-13 13:44 GMT+02:00 <Kerry.Taylor@csiro.au<mailto:Kerry.Taylor@csiro.au>>:
I agree that this ISSUE-9   may be “out of scope” but looks more like a property we should try to achieve in our ontology deliverables, rather than a best practice requirement. I have heard several requests for this for the SSN ontology, in particular.

I would not like to see it go away --- perhaps record on our “ontology design principles” page on the wiki  for now? Or maybe it is a non-functional requirement?  Ideally, we would support most languages, but realistically that will not happen. But it would be a shame to fail to support the languages we can drawing from the capability of the Group.

Kerry

From: Alejandro Llaves [mailto:allaves@fi.upm.es<mailto:allaves@fi.upm.es>]
Sent: Tuesday, 12 May 2015 7:30 PM
To: Frans Knibbe
Cc: SDW WG Public List
Subject: Re: First try at using the tracker for a UCR issue

Hi Frans,

I think this is a good idea to have URLs to point to issues and to track the corresponding discussion, but I'm not sure if the issue will be discussed on the group if it is not raised on the mailing list. So I would combine the issue tracker + the mailing list, just as you did ;)

Cheers,
Alejandro

On 11 May 2015 at 17:12, Frans Knibbe <frans.knibbe@geodan.nl<mailto:frans.knibbe@geodan.nl>> wrote:
Hello Alejandro,

I have just added a new issue (ISSUE-9<http://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/track/issues/9>) in the tracker about one of the requirements in the UCR document. I wonder if it will prove beneficial to bring up an issue this way, instead of opening a thread on the list.

Regards,
Frans

--
Frans Knibbe
Geodan
President Kennedylaan 1
1079 MB Amsterdam (NL)

T +31 (0)20 - 5711 347<tel:%2B31%20%280%2920%20-%205711%20347>
E frans.knibbe@geodan.nl<mailto:frans.knibbe@geodan.nl>
www.geodan.nl<http://www.geodan.nl>
disclaimer<http://www.geodan.nl/disclaimer>




--
Alejandro Llaves

Ontology Engineering Group (OEG)

Artificial Intelligence Department

Universidad Politécnica de Madrid

Avda. Montepríncipe s/n

Boadilla del Monte, 28660 Madrid, Spain



http://www.oeg-upm.net/index.php/phd/325-allaves




allaves@fi.upm.es<mailto:allaves@fi.upm.es>



--
Frans Knibbe
Geodan
President Kennedylaan 1
1079 MB Amsterdam (NL)

T +31 (0)20 - 5711 347
E frans.knibbe@geodan.nl<mailto:frans.knibbe@geodan.nl>
www.geodan.nl<http://www.geodan.nl>
disclaimer<http://www.geodan.nl/disclaimer>