- From: Phil Archer <phila@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 13 May 2015 15:06:58 +0100
- To: SDW WG Public List <public-sdw-wg@w3.org>
The minutes of today's call are at http://www.w3.org/2015/05/13-sdw-minutes Thanks Jeremy for scribing. We talked about finishing off the first draft of the UCR with lots of actions on people to review their use cases. A text version of the minutes is pasted below. Spatial Data on the Web Working Group Teleconference 13 May 2015 See also: [2]IRC log [2] http://www.w3.org/2015/05/13-sdw-irc Attendees Present eparsons, LarsG, PhilippeThiran, Alejandro_Llaves, Phila, jtandy, kerry, billroberts, aharth, Linda, ChrisLittle, Frans, JoshLieberman, AndreaPerego Regrets Rachel, Antoine, chaals, Clemens_Portele, Cory_Henson, Stefan_Lemme, Simon_Cox Chair eparsons Scribe jtandy, Jeremy Tandy Contents * [3]Topics * [4]Summary of Action Items __________________________________________________________ <trackbot> Date: 13 May 2015 <phila> [5]http://www.w3.org/2015/03/inspire/ [5] http://www.w3.org/2015/03/inspire/ <billroberts> got it now, thanks <Alejandro_Llaves> I just joined the webex <scribe> scribe: jtandy <scribe> scribe: Jeremy Tandy <phila> For those who are in mourning for zakim... [6]http://www.w3.org/2015/05/zakim.mp3 [6] http://www.w3.org/2015/05/zakim.mp3 <scribe> scribenick: jtandy <Frans> +Frans <eparsons> [7]http://www.w3.org/2015/05/06-sdw-minutes [7] http://www.w3.org/2015/05/06-sdw-minutes eparsons: requests approval of last weeks minutes ... <eparsons> +1 <phila> (I was absent) +1 <LarsG> +1 <Alejandro_Llaves> +1 <Frans> +1 <kerry> PROPOSED: accept last weeks minutes, kerry RESOLUTION: accept last weeks minutes eparsons: asks if there's anyone new on the call [no response] eparsons: does the weekly OGC patents call ... ... main effort this week is looking at the completion of the use cases for the second group ... SSN, Time, Coverage kerry: we're going to work through the use cases using the requirements doc in it's current state <Alejandro_Llaves> Latest version updated today: [8]http://w3c.github.io/sdw/UseCases/SDWUseCasesAndRequirements .html [8] http://w3c.github.io/sdw/UseCases/SDWUseCasesAndRequirements.html kerry: starting with #31 <Frans> [9]http://w3c.github.io/sdw/UseCases/SDWUseCasesAndRequirements .html#SelectHierarchicalGeographicalRegionsForUseInDataAnalysis OrVisualisation [9] http://w3c.github.io/sdw/UseCases/SDWUseCasesAndRequirements.html#SelectHierarchicalGeographicalRegionsForUseInDataAnalysisOrVisualisation <phila> [10]UC 31 [10] http://w3c.github.io/sdw/UseCases/SDWUseCasesAndRequirements.html#SelectHierarchicalGeographicalRegionsForUseInDataAnalysisOrVisualisation Frans: [agrees with kerry] we will put issues into the tracker based on today's discussion ... why do we start with #31? <Alejandro_Llaves> +q on completing use cases kerry: we've not covered these as a group - I think Alejandro_Llaves has done it independently <Zakim> Alejandro_Llaves, you wanted to comment on completing use cases [it = put the requirements into the spreadsheet!] Alejandro_Llaves: yes - this was me. we called for contribution from the people who put the use cases in <phila> [11]The spreadsheet [11] https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1PSnpJYQDgsdgZgPJEfUU0EhVfgFFYGc1WL4xUX9Dunk/edit#gid=0 Alejandro_Llaves: and for those that did not response I made a best guess <Frans> I should note that numbering of use cases is different in spreadsheet and UCR document. The IDs should be stable. kerry: we have discussed things at 2 other meetings since the F2F Alejandro_Llaves: I would say that going through the use cases one by one as a group will be very time consuming ... that's why we asked for contribution <phila> [12]http://w3c.github.io/sdw/UseCases/SDWUseCasesAndRequirement s.html#LocatingAThing [12] http://w3c.github.io/sdw/UseCases/SDWUseCasesAndRequirements.html#LocatingAThing phila: looking through the UC doc, there are some that don't have any requirements (see example) ... are there some use cases that don't have requirements or is it that this is still a work in progress <Alejandro_Llaves> +q on completeness of UCR document in SSN and Time Frans: [work in progress] it makes sense to get a reasonably good list of requirements _before_ we try to put in the links to use cases <Zakim> Alejandro_Llaves, you wanted to comment on completeness of UCR document in SSN and Time phila: do we need all 47 use caes? ... if there are some that don't really relate to requirements? Alejandro_Llaves: I finished today to complete the use cases for the time ontology deliverable ... coverage has not been done yet ... there are still some [use cases] where things are not really clear yet billrobe_: there is a chance that some requirements are not captured - nor the links between reqs and UC <Alejandro_Llaves> +q billrobe_: happy to do this [offline] - what's the easiest way to provide this input? Frans: it's up to me to provide the connections between UC and reqs - ... but noticed that the reqs weren't stable yet ... some UC are isolated because I haven't got around to them yet ... all 47 UC are probably relevant <eparsons> +1 to all 47 <billrobe_> so just email questions/comments/suggestions to the list? or do a Github pull request? Frans: responding to @billrobe_ the key thing is to check that the requirement is clear Alejandro_Llaves: adds that the best way to contribute is by editing the spreadsheet ... then we can add the content of the comment into the [doc] <billrobe_> ok thanks Alejandro <phila> jtandy: When we're looking at the reqs, do we want to check that they are testable? Alejandro_Llaves: if it is not clear then we will raise an issue of the tracker Frans: being testable is not an explicit "requirement for requirement" <Zakim> kerry, you wanted to talk on testable requrements jtandy: we should be thinking about _if_ we can build a test for the requirement ... else if might be a principle Frans: I've added the testability into the glossary kerry: we have both functional and non-functional requirements - the latter don't have to be testable ... so not all reqs need to be tested eparsons: let's get back to the agenda? kerry: do we need to go through the use cases in plenary? ... perhaps just to look at only those use cases that don't have reqs yet ... @billrobe_ - do you want to review UC 31 here & now or do that offline billrobe_: prefer to do this offline & report back kerry: we're apply @billrobe_'s response to everyone ... this applies to EVERYONE <Zakim> phila, you wanted to suggest action items? <Frans> Is 31 the spreadsheet number or or the UCR number? <phila> ACTION: Bill Roberts to check that the requirements have been captured from [13]http://w3c.github.io/sdw/UseCases/SDWUseCasesAndRequirement s.html#SelectHierarchicalGeographicalRegionsForUseInDataAnalysi sOrVisualisation [recorded in [14]http://www.w3.org/2015/05/13-sdw-minutes.html#action01] [13] http://w3c.github.io/sdw/UseCases/SDWUseCasesAndRequirements.html#SelectHierarchicalGeographicalRegionsForUseInDataAnalysisOrVisualisation [14] http://www.w3.org/2015/05/13-sdw-minutes.html#action01] <trackbot> Created ACTION-27 - Roberts to check that the requirements have been captured from [15]http://w3c.github.io/sdw/usecases/sdwusecasesandrequirement s.html#selecthierarchicalgeographicalregionsforuseindataanalysi sorvisualisation [on Bill Roberts - due 2015-05-20]. [15] http://w3c.github.io/sdw/usecases/sdwusecasesandrequirements.html#selecthierarchicalgeographicalregionsforuseindataanalysisorvisualisation kerry: if you've proposed a use case then you are now [required] to do the review of the requirements billrobe_: it's time now to go back through the use cases and requirements and build the x-refs kerry: there's more meat on the bones of the requirements - so they'll be easier to work with ... the spreadsheet is most up to date for coverage requirements ... primarily we're looking at defining _new_ requirements phila: I've created an action for billroberts ... do you want me to do the same for all the others? kerry: what about those people not in the group? <JoshLieberman> UC 31 - might want to consider that what's being described is largely a discrete coverage, so the coverage deliverable might be involved. phila: action item on me to write to Erwin - I think he's the only one [phila makes a joke] [tumbleweed] <phila> ACTION: kerry to review [16]http://w3c.github.io/sdw/UseCases/SDWUseCasesAndRequirement s.html#SatelliteDataProcessing in terms of requirements [recorded in [17]http://www.w3.org/2015/05/13-sdw-minutes.html#action02] [16] http://w3c.github.io/sdw/UseCases/SDWUseCasesAndRequirements.html#SatelliteDataProcessing [17] http://www.w3.org/2015/05/13-sdw-minutes.html#action02] <trackbot> Created ACTION-28 - Review [18]http://w3c.github.io/sdw/usecases/sdwusecasesandrequirement s.html#satellitedataprocessing in terms of requirements [on Kerry Taylor - due 2015-05-20]. [18] http://w3c.github.io/sdw/usecases/sdwusecasesandrequirements.html#satellitedataprocessing JoshLieberman: UC ?? describes a discrete coverage - features that cover that geographical domain. <phila> ACTION: simon to review [19]http://w3c.github.io/sdw/UseCases/SDWUseCasesAndRequirement s.html#MarineObservationsEMII in terms of requirements [recorded in [20]http://www.w3.org/2015/05/13-sdw-minutes.html#action03] [19] http://w3c.github.io/sdw/UseCases/SDWUseCasesAndRequirements.html#MarineObservationsEMII [20] http://www.w3.org/2015/05/13-sdw-minutes.html#action03] <trackbot> Created ACTION-29 - Review [21]http://w3c.github.io/sdw/usecases/sdwusecasesandrequirement s.html#marineobservationsemii in terms of requirements [on Simon Cox - due 2015-05-20]. [21] http://w3c.github.io/sdw/usecases/sdwusecasesandrequirements.html#marineobservationsemii JoshLieberman: therefore discrete coverages become a key requirement for UC 31 <phila> ACTION: Simon to review [22]http://w3c.github.io/sdw/UseCases/SDWUseCasesAndRequirement s.html#MarineObservationsDataProviders in terms of requirements [recorded in [23]http://www.w3.org/2015/05/13-sdw-minutes.html#action04] [22] http://w3c.github.io/sdw/UseCases/SDWUseCasesAndRequirements.html#MarineObservationsDataProviders [23] http://www.w3.org/2015/05/13-sdw-minutes.html#action04] <trackbot> Created ACTION-30 - Review [24]http://w3c.github.io/sdw/usecases/sdwusecasesandrequirement s.html#marineobservationsdataproviders in terms of requirements [on Simon Cox - due 2015-05-20]. [24] http://w3c.github.io/sdw/usecases/sdwusecasesandrequirements.html#marineobservationsdataproviders <Alejandro_Llaves> +q on sub-requirements <Zakim> Alejandro_Llaves, you wanted to comment on sub-requirements <phila> ACTION: Simon to review [25]http://w3c.github.io/sdw/UseCases/SDWUseCasesAndRequirement s.html#MarineObservationsDataConsumers in terms of requirements [recorded in [26]http://www.w3.org/2015/05/13-sdw-minutes.html#action05] [25] http://w3c.github.io/sdw/UseCases/SDWUseCasesAndRequirements.html#MarineObservationsDataConsumers [26] http://www.w3.org/2015/05/13-sdw-minutes.html#action05] <trackbot> Created ACTION-31 - Review [27]http://w3c.github.io/sdw/usecases/sdwusecasesandrequirement s.html#marineobservationsdataconsumers in terms of requirements [on Simon Cox - due 2015-05-20]. [27] http://w3c.github.io/sdw/usecases/sdwusecasesandrequirements.html#marineobservationsdataconsumers eparsons: so let's close that out at the moment and follow up next week to make sure everyone has done their actions! Alejandro_Llaves: how do we deal with sub requirements? <phila> ACTION: Linda to review [28]http://w3c.github.io/sdw/UseCases/SDWUseCasesAndRequirement s.html#BuildingInformationManagementAndDataSharing, which came from Henk Schaap - Gobar, in terms of requirements [recorded in [29]http://www.w3.org/2015/05/13-sdw-minutes.html#action06] [28] http://w3c.github.io/sdw/UseCases/SDWUseCasesAndRequirements.html#BuildingInformationManagementAndDataSharing, [29] http://www.w3.org/2015/05/13-sdw-minutes.html#action06] <trackbot> Created ACTION-32 - Review [30]http://w3c.github.io/sdw/usecases/sdwusecasesandrequirement s.html#buildinginformationmanagementanddatasharing, which came from henk schaap - gobar, in terms of requirements [on Linda van den Brink - due 2015-05-20]. [30] http://w3c.github.io/sdw/usecases/sdwusecasesandrequirements.html#buildinginformationmanagementanddatasharing, Alejandro_Llaves: for example, coverage reqs spreadsheet indicates [an example of] a sub requirement <phila> ACTION: kerry to review [31]http://w3c.github.io/sdw/UseCases/SDWUseCasesAndRequirement s.html#LandsatDataServices, which came from Aaron Sedgmen of Geoscience Australia, in terms of requirements [recorded in [32]http://www.w3.org/2015/05/13-sdw-minutes.html#action07] [31] http://w3c.github.io/sdw/UseCases/SDWUseCasesAndRequirements.html#LandsatDataServices, [32] http://www.w3.org/2015/05/13-sdw-minutes.html#action07] <trackbot> Created ACTION-33 - Review [33]http://w3c.github.io/sdw/usecases/sdwusecasesandrequirement s.html#landsatdataservices, which came from aaron sedgmen of geoscience australia, in terms of requirements [on Kerry Taylor - due 2015-05-20]. [33] http://w3c.github.io/sdw/usecases/sdwusecasesandrequirements.html#landsatdataservices, Alejandro_Llaves: should we treat as a sub requirement or individual requirements? eparsons: what was the rationale for making a sub requirement? <phila> ACTION: kerry to review [34]http://w3c.github.io/sdw/UseCases/SDWUseCasesAndRequirement s.html#MetadataAndSearchGranularity, which came from Aaron Sedgmen of Geoscience Australia, in terms of requirements [recorded in [35]http://www.w3.org/2015/05/13-sdw-minutes.html#action08] [34] http://w3c.github.io/sdw/UseCases/SDWUseCasesAndRequirements.html#MetadataAndSearchGranularity, [35] http://www.w3.org/2015/05/13-sdw-minutes.html#action08] <trackbot> Created ACTION-34 - Review [36]http://w3c.github.io/sdw/usecases/sdwusecasesandrequirement s.html#metadataandsearchgranularity, which came from aaron sedgmen of geoscience australia, in terms of requirements [on Kerry Taylor - due 2015-05-20]. [36] http://w3c.github.io/sdw/usecases/sdwusecasesandrequirements.html#metadataandsearchgranularity, Alejandro_Llaves: the content of the requirement comes from both coverage and time deliverables <Zakim> kerry, you wanted to speak on subrequirements <phila> ACTION: kerry to review [37]http://w3c.github.io/sdw/UseCases/SDWUseCasesAndRequirement s.html#CrowdSourcedEarthquakeObservationInformation, which came from Aaron Sedgmen of Geoscience Australia, in terms of requirements [recorded in [38]http://www.w3.org/2015/05/13-sdw-minutes.html#action09] [37] http://w3c.github.io/sdw/UseCases/SDWUseCasesAndRequirements.html#CrowdSourcedEarthquakeObservationInformation, [38] http://www.w3.org/2015/05/13-sdw-minutes.html#action09] <trackbot> Created ACTION-35 - Review [39]http://w3c.github.io/sdw/usecases/sdwusecasesandrequirement s.html#crowdsourcedearthquakeobservationinformation, which came from aaron sedgmen of geoscience australia, in terms of requirements [on Kerry Taylor - due 2015-05-20]. [39] http://w3c.github.io/sdw/usecases/sdwusecasesandrequirements.html#crowdsourcedearthquakeobservationinformation, <phila> ACTION: erich to review [40]http://w3c.github.io/sdw/UseCases/SDWUseCasesAndRequirement s.html#TCGAMicroscopyImaging in terms of requirements [recorded in [41]http://www.w3.org/2015/05/13-sdw-minutes.html#action10] [40] http://w3c.github.io/sdw/UseCases/SDWUseCasesAndRequirements.html#TCGAMicroscopyImaging [41] http://www.w3.org/2015/05/13-sdw-minutes.html#action10] <trackbot> Created ACTION-36 - Review [42]http://w3c.github.io/sdw/usecases/sdwusecasesandrequirement s.html#tcgamicroscopyimaging in terms of requirements [on Erich Bremer - due 2015-05-20]. [42] http://w3c.github.io/sdw/usecases/sdwusecasesandrequirements.html#tcgamicroscopyimaging <AndreaPerego> ACTION: AndreaPerego to review [43]http://w3c.github.io/sdw/UseCases/SDWUseCasesAndRequirement s.html#GeospatialExtensionsToDomainIndependentMetadataSchemas in terms of requirements [recorded in [44]http://www.w3.org/2015/05/13-sdw-minutes.html#action11] [43] http://w3c.github.io/sdw/UseCases/SDWUseCasesAndRequirements.html#GeospatialExtensionsToDomainIndependentMetadataSchemas [44] http://www.w3.org/2015/05/13-sdw-minutes.html#action11] kerry: suggests that you wrap it into one requirement - but make it explicit that this covers spatial and time <trackbot> Created ACTION-37 - Review [45]http://w3c.github.io/sdw/usecases/sdwusecasesandrequirement s.html#geospatialextensionstodomainindependentmetadataschemas in terms of requirements [on Andrea Perego - due 2015-05-20]. [45] http://w3c.github.io/sdw/usecases/sdwusecasesandrequirements.html#geospatialextensionstodomainindependentmetadataschemas <phila> ACTION: kerry to review [46]http://w3c.github.io/sdw/UseCases/SDWUseCasesAndRequirement s.html#CropYieldEstimationUsingMultipleSatellites, which came from Zheng-Shu Zhou, in terms of requirements [recorded in [47]http://www.w3.org/2015/05/13-sdw-minutes.html#action12] [46] http://w3c.github.io/sdw/UseCases/SDWUseCasesAndRequirements.html#CropYieldEstimationUsingMultipleSatellites, [47] http://www.w3.org/2015/05/13-sdw-minutes.html#action12] <trackbot> Created ACTION-38 - Review [48]http://w3c.github.io/sdw/usecases/sdwusecasesandrequirement s.html#cropyieldestimationusingmultiplesatellites, which came from zheng-shu zhou, in terms of requirements [on Kerry Taylor - due 2015-05-20]. [48] http://w3c.github.io/sdw/usecases/sdwusecasesandrequirements.html#cropyieldestimationusingmultiplesatellites, kerry: have one requirement- the more general one <AndreaPerego> ACTION: AndreaPerego to review [49]http://w3c.github.io/sdw/UseCases/SDWUseCasesAndRequirement s.html#ImprovingDiscoveryOfSpatialDataOnTheWeb in terms of requirements [recorded in [50]http://www.w3.org/2015/05/13-sdw-minutes.html#action13] [49] http://w3c.github.io/sdw/UseCases/SDWUseCasesAndRequirements.html#ImprovingDiscoveryOfSpatialDataOnTheWeb [50] http://www.w3.org/2015/05/13-sdw-minutes.html#action13] <trackbot> Created ACTION-39 - Review [51]http://w3c.github.io/sdw/usecases/sdwusecasesandrequirement s.html#improvingdiscoveryofspatialdataontheweb in terms of requirements [on Andrea Perego - due 2015-05-20]. [51] http://w3c.github.io/sdw/usecases/sdwusecasesandrequirements.html#improvingdiscoveryofspatialdataontheweb <phila> ACTION: perego to review [52]http://w3c.github.io/sdw/UseCases/SDWUseCasesAndRequirement s.html#GeospatialExtensionsToDomainIndependentMetadataSchemas in terms of requirements [recorded in [53]http://www.w3.org/2015/05/13-sdw-minutes.html#action14] [52] http://w3c.github.io/sdw/UseCases/SDWUseCasesAndRequirements.html#GeospatialExtensionsToDomainIndependentMetadataSchemas [53] http://www.w3.org/2015/05/13-sdw-minutes.html#action14] <trackbot> Created ACTION-40 - Review [54]http://w3c.github.io/sdw/usecases/sdwusecasesandrequirement s.html#geospatialextensionstodomainindependentmetadataschemas in terms of requirements [on Andrea Perego - due 2015-05-20]. [54] http://w3c.github.io/sdw/usecases/sdwusecasesandrequirements.html#geospatialextensionstodomainindependentmetadataschemas kerry: but include the specific sub cases as part of the description of the general requirement <phila> ACTION: perego to review [55]http://w3c.github.io/sdw/UseCases/SDWUseCasesAndRequirement s.html#ImprovingDiscoveryOfSpatialDataOnTheWeb in terms of requirements [recorded in [56]http://www.w3.org/2015/05/13-sdw-minutes.html#action15] [55] http://w3c.github.io/sdw/UseCases/SDWUseCasesAndRequirements.html#ImprovingDiscoveryOfSpatialDataOnTheWeb [56] http://www.w3.org/2015/05/13-sdw-minutes.html#action15] <trackbot> Created ACTION-41 - Review [57]http://w3c.github.io/sdw/usecases/sdwusecasesandrequirement s.html#improvingdiscoveryofspatialdataontheweb in terms of requirements [on Andrea Perego - due 2015-05-20]. [57] http://w3c.github.io/sdw/usecases/sdwusecasesandrequirements.html#improvingdiscoveryofspatialdataontheweb Alejandro_Llaves: [... indicates that this could be complex] kerry: I think this is OK - it's ok for a requirement to refer back to multiple delierables <phila> ACTION: Archer to contact Erwin Folmer and ask him to review [58]http://w3c.github.io/sdw/UseCases/SDWUseCasesAndRequirement s.html#INSPIREComplianceUsingWebStandards in terms of requirements [recorded in [59]http://www.w3.org/2015/05/13-sdw-minutes.html#action16] [58] http://w3c.github.io/sdw/UseCases/SDWUseCasesAndRequirements.html#INSPIREComplianceUsingWebStandards [59] http://www.w3.org/2015/05/13-sdw-minutes.html#action16] <trackbot> Created ACTION-42 - Contact erwin folmer and ask him to review [60]http://w3c.github.io/sdw/usecases/sdwusecasesandrequirement s.html#inspirecomplianceusingwebstandards in terms of requirements [on Phil Archer - due 2015-05-20]. [60] http://w3c.github.io/sdw/usecases/sdwusecasesandrequirements.html#inspirecomplianceusingwebstandards <phila> ACTION: Grossner to review [61]http://w3c.github.io/sdw/UseCases/SDWUseCasesAndRequirement s.html#EventlikeGeographicFeatures in terms of requirements [recorded in [62]http://www.w3.org/2015/05/13-sdw-minutes.html#action17] [61] http://w3c.github.io/sdw/UseCases/SDWUseCasesAndRequirements.html#EventlikeGeographicFeatures [62] http://www.w3.org/2015/05/13-sdw-minutes.html#action17] <trackbot> Created ACTION-43 - Review [63]http://w3c.github.io/sdw/usecases/sdwusecasesandrequirement s.html#eventlikegeographicfeatures in terms of requirements [on Karl Grossner - due 2015-05-20]. [63] http://w3c.github.io/sdw/usecases/sdwusecasesandrequirements.html#eventlikegeographicfeatures kerry: I think the way that the document is structured, it's ok to refer to multiple deliverabes <ChrisLittle> +1 for Kerry 's single req <phila> ACTION: Tandy to review [64]http://w3c.github.io/sdw/UseCases/SDWUseCasesAndRequirement s.html#CreationOfVirtualObservationsfromAnalysisPhaseOfWeatherP redictionModel in terms of requirements [recorded in [65]http://www.w3.org/2015/05/13-sdw-minutes.html#action18] [64] http://w3c.github.io/sdw/UseCases/SDWUseCasesAndRequirements.html#CreationOfVirtualObservationsfromAnalysisPhaseOfWeatherPredictionModel [65] http://www.w3.org/2015/05/13-sdw-minutes.html#action18] <trackbot> Created ACTION-44 - Review [66]http://w3c.github.io/sdw/usecases/sdwusecasesandrequirement s.html#creationofvirtualobservationsfromanalysisphaseofweatherp redictionmodel in terms of requirements [on Jeremy Tandy - due 2015-05-20]. [66] http://w3c.github.io/sdw/usecases/sdwusecasesandrequirements.html#creationofvirtualobservationsfromanalysisphaseofweatherpredictionmodel Alejandro_Llaves: so- sub requirements get rolled up into their primary? kerry: yes Frans: agrees with @kerry <phila> ACTION: Lemme to review [67]http://w3c.github.io/sdw/UseCases/SDWUseCasesAndRequirement s.html#IncorporatingGeospatialDataIntoInteractive3DGraphicsOnTh eWeb in terms of requirements [recorded in [68]http://www.w3.org/2015/05/13-sdw-minutes.html#action19] [67] http://w3c.github.io/sdw/UseCases/SDWUseCasesAndRequirements.html#IncorporatingGeospatialDataIntoInteractive3DGraphicsOnTheWeb [68] http://www.w3.org/2015/05/13-sdw-minutes.html#action19] <trackbot> Created ACTION-45 - Review [69]http://w3c.github.io/sdw/usecases/sdwusecasesandrequirement s.html#incorporatinggeospatialdataintointeractive3dgraphicsonth eweb in terms of requirements [on Stefan Lemme - due 2015-05-20]. [69] http://w3c.github.io/sdw/usecases/sdwusecasesandrequirements.html#incorporatinggeospatialdataintointeractive3dgraphicsontheweb Frans: make it lean and mean ... not too many and not a hierarchy ChrisLittle: supports kerry's perspective ... we want to avoid space, time and space-time versions of the same requirements Linda: when we looked at the requirements we came up with lots of sub-requirements ... they were often "cryptic" so we needed to add more detail to clarify ... adding sub requirements was a good way to do this ... to make them testable Frans: I also had problems with some of the requirements - many were only a single line of text ... they need to be clear - if you don't understand, please raise an issue and the editors will fix ... I like examples - include these for clarification ... the group could help by looking at the requirements to see if they are clear - that would be helpful Linda: so the requirements doc is [stable] enough to do that now? Frans: at the moment we [editors] are working through requirements now Alejandro_Llaves: until we have the first public draft ... the FPWD will include a transcript of the spreadsheet <Frans> I hear the drummer get busy eparsons: to clarify - the editors recommendation is to hold off reviewing the requirements spreadsheet ... until FPWD? Frans: perhaps <Alejandro_Llaves> +q Frans: if people do the actions currently being generated by @phila then this will help with the review ... so let's wait until the actions have been completed kerry: @Linda - there's nothing to stop you providing review now ... if you spot something please raise it with the editors Alejandro_Llaves: please provide review and comment - ... from the _spreadsheet_ ... the document is not finished! ... we're still transcribing things across eparsons: thanks for clarifying that ... EVERYONE: do you actions for next week ... moving on ... remaining agenda items are more homework ... review the principles page ... look at what's there now <Zakim> kerry, you wanted to speak on principles eparsons: it does require more work kerry: I've added some stuff on the wiki about principles ... just a couple of hours ago ... add your own comments ... please use your names so we can argue (oops) clarify the points [principles wiki page: [70]https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/wiki/BP_Principles] [70] https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/wiki/BP_Principles] <ChrisLittle> s /volunteer/victim/ eparsons: we're going to be looking for BP doc editors ... please think about that ... also please be aware that you can add stuff to the standing agenda ... e.g. a presentation or topic that you would like to discuss ... AOB? <Zakim> phila, you wanted to ask who's going to GWF <eparsons> I going to GWF phila: is anyone going to the [INSPIRE] Lisbon meeting - particularly Tuesday evening? eparsons: I'll be there <AndreaPerego> Won't be in Lisbon for the INSPIRE ‐ Geospatial World Forum 2015 [anything for a social!] Frans: how would we share the presentations? eparsons: do this as part of the regular meeting ... using this new fangled webex thing too ... and please add the presentations on the wiki too ... of course, we want content related to our scope - [not anything random] kerry: can we try next week? Frans: [offers to be guineapig] eparsons: thanks <ChrisLittle> bye <Alejandro_Llaves> thanks, bye! eparsons: ok - we're done today <AndreaPerego> Thanks, bye bye Summary of Action Items [NEW] ACTION: AndreaPerego to review [71]http://w3c.github.io/sdw/UseCases/SDWUseCasesAndRequirement s.html#GeospatialExtensionsToDomainIndependentMetadataSchemas in terms of requirements [recorded in [72]http://www.w3.org/2015/05/13-sdw-minutes.html#action11] [NEW] ACTION: AndreaPerego to review [73]http://w3c.github.io/sdw/UseCases/SDWUseCasesAndRequirement s.html#ImprovingDiscoveryOfSpatialDataOnTheWeb in terms of requirements [recorded in [74]http://www.w3.org/2015/05/13-sdw-minutes.html#action13] [NEW] ACTION: Archer to contact Erwin Folmer and ask him to review [75]http://w3c.github.io/sdw/UseCases/SDWUseCasesAndRequirement s.html#INSPIREComplianceUsingWebStandards in terms of requirements [recorded in [76]http://www.w3.org/2015/05/13-sdw-minutes.html#action16] [NEW] ACTION: Bill Roberts to check that the requirements have been captured from [77]http://w3c.github.io/sdw/UseCases/SDWUseCasesAndRequirement s.html#SelectHierarchicalGeographicalRegionsForUseInDataAnalysi sOrVisualisation [recorded in [78]http://www.w3.org/2015/05/13-sdw-minutes.html#action01] [NEW] ACTION: erich to review [79]http://w3c.github.io/sdw/UseCases/SDWUseCasesAndRequirement s.html#TCGAMicroscopyImaging in terms of requirements [recorded in [80]http://www.w3.org/2015/05/13-sdw-minutes.html#action10] [NEW] ACTION: Grossner to review [81]http://w3c.github.io/sdw/UseCases/SDWUseCasesAndRequirement s.html#EventlikeGeographicFeatures in terms of requirements [recorded in [82]http://www.w3.org/2015/05/13-sdw-minutes.html#action17] [NEW] ACTION: kerry to review [83]http://w3c.github.io/sdw/UseCases/SDWUseCasesAndRequirement s.html#CropYieldEstimationUsingMultipleSatellites, which came from Zheng-Shu Zhou, in terms of requirements [recorded in [84]http://www.w3.org/2015/05/13-sdw-minutes.html#action12] [NEW] ACTION: kerry to review [85]http://w3c.github.io/sdw/UseCases/SDWUseCasesAndRequirement s.html#CrowdSourcedEarthquakeObservationInformation, which came from Aaron Sedgmen of Geoscience Australia, in terms of requirements [recorded in [86]http://www.w3.org/2015/05/13-sdw-minutes.html#action09] [NEW] ACTION: kerry to review [87]http://w3c.github.io/sdw/UseCases/SDWUseCasesAndRequirement s.html#LandsatDataServices, which came from Aaron Sedgmen of Geoscience Australia, in terms of requirements [recorded in [88]http://www.w3.org/2015/05/13-sdw-minutes.html#action07] [NEW] ACTION: kerry to review [89]http://w3c.github.io/sdw/UseCases/SDWUseCasesAndRequirement s.html#MetadataAndSearchGranularity, which came from Aaron Sedgmen of Geoscience Australia, in terms of requirements [recorded in [90]http://www.w3.org/2015/05/13-sdw-minutes.html#action08] [NEW] ACTION: kerry to review [91]http://w3c.github.io/sdw/UseCases/SDWUseCasesAndRequirement s.html#SatelliteDataProcessing in terms of requirements [recorded in [92]http://www.w3.org/2015/05/13-sdw-minutes.html#action02] [NEW] ACTION: Lemme to review [93]http://w3c.github.io/sdw/UseCases/SDWUseCasesAndRequirement s.html#IncorporatingGeospatialDataIntoInteractive3DGraphicsOnTh eWeb in terms of requirements [recorded in [94]http://www.w3.org/2015/05/13-sdw-minutes.html#action19] [NEW] ACTION: Linda to review [95]http://w3c.github.io/sdw/UseCases/SDWUseCasesAndRequirement s.html#BuildingInformationManagementAndDataSharing, which came from Henk Schaap - Gobar, in terms of requirements [recorded in [96]http://www.w3.org/2015/05/13-sdw-minutes.html#action06] [NEW] ACTION: perego to review [97]http://w3c.github.io/sdw/UseCases/SDWUseCasesAndRequirement s.html#GeospatialExtensionsToDomainIndependentMetadataSchemas in terms of requirements [recorded in [98]http://www.w3.org/2015/05/13-sdw-minutes.html#action14] [NEW] ACTION: perego to review [99]http://w3c.github.io/sdw/UseCases/SDWUseCasesAndRequirement s.html#ImprovingDiscoveryOfSpatialDataOnTheWeb in terms of requirements [recorded in [100]http://www.w3.org/2015/05/13-sdw-minutes.html#action15] [NEW] ACTION: Simon to review [101]http://w3c.github.io/sdw/UseCases/SDWUseCasesAndRequiremen ts.html#MarineObservationsDataConsumers in terms of requirements [recorded in [102]http://www.w3.org/2015/05/13-sdw-minutes.html#action05] [NEW] ACTION: Simon to review [103]http://w3c.github.io/sdw/UseCases/SDWUseCasesAndRequiremen ts.html#MarineObservationsDataProviders in terms of requirements [recorded in [104]http://www.w3.org/2015/05/13-sdw-minutes.html#action04] [NEW] ACTION: simon to review [105]http://w3c.github.io/sdw/UseCases/SDWUseCasesAndRequiremen ts.html#MarineObservationsEMII in terms of requirements [recorded in [106]http://www.w3.org/2015/05/13-sdw-minutes.html#action03] [NEW] ACTION: Tandy to review [107]http://w3c.github.io/sdw/UseCases/SDWUseCasesAndRequiremen ts.html#CreationOfVirtualObservationsfromAnalysisPhaseOfWeather PredictionModel in terms of requirements [recorded in [108]http://www.w3.org/2015/05/13-sdw-minutes.html#action18] [71] http://w3c.github.io/sdw/UseCases/SDWUseCasesAndRequirements.html#GeospatialExtensionsToDomainIndependentMetadataSchemas [72] http://www.w3.org/2015/05/13-sdw-minutes.html#action11 [73] http://w3c.github.io/sdw/UseCases/SDWUseCasesAndRequirements.html#ImprovingDiscoveryOfSpatialDataOnTheWeb [74] http://www.w3.org/2015/05/13-sdw-minutes.html#action13 [75] http://w3c.github.io/sdw/UseCases/SDWUseCasesAndRequirements.html#INSPIREComplianceUsingWebStandards [76] http://www.w3.org/2015/05/13-sdw-minutes.html#action16 [77] http://w3c.github.io/sdw/UseCases/SDWUseCasesAndRequirements.html#SelectHierarchicalGeographicalRegionsForUseInDataAnalysisOrVisualisation [78] http://www.w3.org/2015/05/13-sdw-minutes.html#action01 [79] http://w3c.github.io/sdw/UseCases/SDWUseCasesAndRequirements.html#TCGAMicroscopyImaging [80] http://www.w3.org/2015/05/13-sdw-minutes.html#action10 [81] http://w3c.github.io/sdw/UseCases/SDWUseCasesAndRequirements.html#EventlikeGeographicFeatures [82] http://www.w3.org/2015/05/13-sdw-minutes.html#action17 [83] http://w3c.github.io/sdw/UseCases/SDWUseCasesAndRequirements.html#CropYieldEstimationUsingMultipleSatellites, [84] http://www.w3.org/2015/05/13-sdw-minutes.html#action12 [85] http://w3c.github.io/sdw/UseCases/SDWUseCasesAndRequirements.html#CrowdSourcedEarthquakeObservationInformation, [86] http://www.w3.org/2015/05/13-sdw-minutes.html#action09 [87] http://w3c.github.io/sdw/UseCases/SDWUseCasesAndRequirements.html#LandsatDataServices, [88] http://www.w3.org/2015/05/13-sdw-minutes.html#action07 [89] http://w3c.github.io/sdw/UseCases/SDWUseCasesAndRequirements.html#MetadataAndSearchGranularity, [90] http://www.w3.org/2015/05/13-sdw-minutes.html#action08 [91] http://w3c.github.io/sdw/UseCases/SDWUseCasesAndRequirements.html#SatelliteDataProcessing [92] http://www.w3.org/2015/05/13-sdw-minutes.html#action02 [93] http://w3c.github.io/sdw/UseCases/SDWUseCasesAndRequirements.html#IncorporatingGeospatialDataIntoInteractive3DGraphicsOnTheWeb [94] http://www.w3.org/2015/05/13-sdw-minutes.html#action19 [95] http://w3c.github.io/sdw/UseCases/SDWUseCasesAndRequirements.html#BuildingInformationManagementAndDataSharing, [96] http://www.w3.org/2015/05/13-sdw-minutes.html#action06 [97] http://w3c.github.io/sdw/UseCases/SDWUseCasesAndRequirements.html#GeospatialExtensionsToDomainIndependentMetadataSchemas [98] http://www.w3.org/2015/05/13-sdw-minutes.html#action14 [99] http://w3c.github.io/sdw/UseCases/SDWUseCasesAndRequirements.html#ImprovingDiscoveryOfSpatialDataOnTheWeb [100] http://www.w3.org/2015/05/13-sdw-minutes.html#action15 [101] http://w3c.github.io/sdw/UseCases/SDWUseCasesAndRequirements.html#MarineObservationsDataConsumers [102] http://www.w3.org/2015/05/13-sdw-minutes.html#action05 [103] http://w3c.github.io/sdw/UseCases/SDWUseCasesAndRequirements.html#MarineObservationsDataProviders [104] http://www.w3.org/2015/05/13-sdw-minutes.html#action04 [105] http://w3c.github.io/sdw/UseCases/SDWUseCasesAndRequirements.html#MarineObservationsEMII [106] http://www.w3.org/2015/05/13-sdw-minutes.html#action03 [107] http://w3c.github.io/sdw/UseCases/SDWUseCasesAndRequirements.html#CreationOfVirtualObservationsfromAnalysisPhaseOfWeatherPredictionModel [108] http://www.w3.org/2015/05/13-sdw-minutes.html#action18 [End of minutes]
Received on Wednesday, 13 May 2015 14:07:28 UTC