W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-sdw-wg@w3.org > May 2015

Re: multilinguality

From: Frans Knibbe <frans.knibbe@geodan.nl>
Date: Wed, 13 May 2015 14:16:10 +0200
Message-ID: <CAFVDz42AtJr1SH4ZKRv6b18cG6ReHE_7b9Qsa2dwcN6VHEHV2g@mail.gmail.com>
To: Kerry Taylor <Kerry.Taylor@csiro.au>
Cc: Alejandro Llaves <allaves@fi.upm.es>, SDW WG Public List <public-sdw-wg@w3.org>
Hello Kerry,

We could say that we want ontologies that have something to do with our
domain (spatiotermporal data) to be multilingual. Although it is a general
good practice for any ontology, we could make it an explicit requirement
for the ontologies that are going to be addressed by the Working Group. If
put this way (spatiotemporal vocabularies should have multilingual
annotation), I think the requirement can be considered in scope.

Regards,
Frans

2015-05-13 13:44 GMT+02:00 <Kerry.Taylor@csiro.au>:

>  I agree that this ISSUE-9   may be “out of scope” but looks more like a
> property we should try to achieve in our ontology deliverables, rather than
> a best practice requirement. I have heard several requests for this for the
> SSN ontology, in particular.
>
>
>
> I would not like to see it go away --- perhaps record on our “ontology
> design principles” page on the wiki  for now? Or maybe it is a
> non-functional requirement?  Ideally, we would support most languages, but
> realistically that will not happen. But it would be a shame to fail to
> support the languages we can drawing from the capability of the Group.
>
>
>
> Kerry
>
>
>
> *From:* Alejandro Llaves [mailto:allaves@fi.upm.es]
> *Sent:* Tuesday, 12 May 2015 7:30 PM
> *To:* Frans Knibbe
> *Cc:* SDW WG Public List
> *Subject:* Re: First try at using the tracker for a UCR issue
>
>
>
> Hi Frans,
>
>
>
> I think this is a good idea to have URLs to point to issues and to track
> the corresponding discussion, but I'm not sure if the issue will be
> discussed on the group if it is not raised on the mailing list. So I would
> combine the issue tracker + the mailing list, just as you did ;)
>
>
>
> Cheers,
>
> Alejandro
>
>
>
> On 11 May 2015 at 17:12, Frans Knibbe <frans.knibbe@geodan.nl> wrote:
>
> Hello Alejandro,
>
>
>
> I have just added a new issue (ISSUE-9
> <http://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/track/issues/9>) in the tracker about one
> of the requirements in the UCR document. I wonder if it will prove
> beneficial to bring up an issue this way, instead of opening a thread on
> the list.
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Frans
>
>
>
> --
>
> Frans Knibbe
>
> Geodan
>
> President Kennedylaan 1
>
> 1079 MB Amsterdam (NL)
>
>
>
> T +31 (0)20 - 5711 347
>
> E frans.knibbe@geodan.nl
>
> www.geodan.nl
>
> disclaimer <http://www.geodan.nl/disclaimer>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> Alejandro Llaves
>
> Ontology Engineering Group (OEG)
>
> Artificial Intelligence Department
>
> Universidad Politécnica de Madrid
>
> Avda. Montepríncipe s/n
>
> Boadilla del Monte, 28660 Madrid, Spain
>
>
>
> http://www.oeg-upm.net/index.php/phd/325-allaves
>
>
>
> allaves@fi.upm.es
>



-- 
Frans Knibbe
Geodan
President Kennedylaan 1
1079 MB Amsterdam (NL)

T +31 (0)20 - 5711 347
E frans.knibbe@geodan.nl
www.geodan.nl
disclaimer <http://www.geodan.nl/disclaimer>
Received on Wednesday, 13 May 2015 12:16:38 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 24 March 2022 20:31:16 UTC