- From: Sean Fraser <sean@theatre-optique.com>
- Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2013 10:28:11 -0800
- To: kcoyle@kcoyle.net, public-schemabibex@w3.org
- Message-Id: <76f71a03cf54648432988c152171205b897b55fe@ghkn-qgld.accessdomain.com>
Karen, I agree that "many of these genres are not mutually exclusive". However, there will always be a hierarchy. A memoir will be a memoir even if it is written in blank verse. The class "memoir" would be used and - in the catalog description - it could state blank verse provided the parsers knew it to be blank verse. Your Library of Congress example is perfect for illustration of mix genres: "The Devil's Dictionary" by Ambrose Bierce is a fictive dictionary and - as such - is readily described as a "dictionary". I reread the Library of Congress' genre list and my suggested classes follow LoC's. Sean ----- Original Message ----- From: kcoyle@kcoyle.net To:"public-schemabibex@w3.org" Cc: Sent:Sun, 06 Jan 2013 17:50:28 -0800 Subject:Re: Literary works missing from Creative Properties and Classes It's always going to be hard to come up with a definitive, and yet easily usable, list. Many of these genres are not mutually exclusive -- I suppose someone could write their memoirs in poetry format I'd worry about mixing literary genre (that is, the form that something is written in, like a poem) and type of content (folktale) However, I looked at the Library of Congress genre list [1] and it, too, seems to mix genre and type (e.g. dictionary and fiction), so I suppose it is inevitable. However, you might want to look at that list to get another point of view. kc [1] http://www.loc.gov/standards/valuelist/marcgt.html
Received on Thursday, 10 January 2013 18:37:23 UTC