Re: proposal just for article

There are seven distinct items here [1] – shouldn't they be linked together
(using e.g. partOf)? Also, some items can be identified as the same (using
the pattern I showed earlier, in both RDFa and microdata).

Since this proposal defines types for both issues and volumes, doesn't it
end up being very close to the original proposal? Albeit with a reduced set
of properties.

(And I'd like to reduce the set of properties where possible. I prefer to
use partOf/hasPart instead of distinct properties for each possible range,
unless required by use cases. Externally linked parts/containers can be
typed too, to mitigate the risk of consumers not getting the nature of the
composition.)

Cheers,
Niklas

[1]:
http://www.google.com/webmasters/tools/richsnippets?q=uploaded:8004ed34f803aa5bb45ed9a29856636c



On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 10:25 PM, Thad Guidry <thadguidry@gmail.com> wrote:

> Big Awesome
> +1
>
> Thanks for this Karen !
>
> And Schema.org has needed an generic Intangible class for Pagination for
> some time now that is not sequestered in CollectionPage or WebPage types
> for that matter.
>
> FYI, the flowers-roots (bottom-up) approach is really the best for
> Schema.org development and proposals.
> Classes and Types (roots) can develop easily from the needed properties
> that are collected and gathered (flowers).
>
> Hope you like that analogy, and hang in there, there will probably be many
> more bumpy rides as you guys go along, I'm sure. :-)
>
>
>
> On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 2:06 PM, Karen Coyle <kcoyle@kcoyle.net> wrote:
>
>> I have done a new (and probably my last) proposal that only covers
>> article markup, leaving aside the description of periodicals qua
>> periodicals and any information about volumes and issues except for the
>> numbering needed to locate the article.
>>
>> http://www.w3.org/community/schemabibex/wiki/Article
>>
>> You can add any alternatives you prefer to this proposal, or make other
>> proposals if you see this differently.
>>
>> kc
>> --
>> Karen Coyle
>> kcoyle@kcoyle.net http://kcoyle.net
>> m: 1-510-435-8234
>> skype: kcoylenet
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> -Thad
> +ThadGuidry <https://www.google.com/+ThadGuidry>
> Thad on LinkedIn <http://www.linkedin.com/in/thadguidry/>
>