- From: Karen Coyle <kcoyle@kcoyle.net>
- Date: Sun, 08 Dec 2013 15:13:01 -0800
- To: Niklas Lindström <lindstream@gmail.com>
- CC: "public-schemabibex@w3.org" <public-schemabibex@w3.org>
Thanks, Niklas - So you are suggesting that we need partOfPeriodical to make this work smoothly? And that would be a new property in Article? If I understand that correctly, we would then have: Article adds: * partOfPeriodical - type: Periodical kc On 12/8/13, 1:42 PM, Niklas Lindström wrote: > Hi Karen, > > Great! I did two variants of the article example, inlined below. In > these, the items are linked (using our suggested partOfPeriodical). They > also overcome a problem with the current version in the wiki, which > describes four separate items (two articles and two periodicals). > > The first is in RDFa, and uses @resource to identify the article and > periodical: > > - - - 8< - - - > > <div vocab="http://schema.org/" typeof="Article"> > <strong>Title:</strong><span property="name"> Be Careful What You > Wish For: FRBR, Some Lacunae, A Review</span><br /> > <strong>Author:</strong> <span property="author">Smiraglia, > Richardp.</span><br /> > <strong>Subjects:</strong> <span property="subject">Catalog</span> > ; <span property="subject">Works</span> <br /> > <strong>Is Part Of:</strong> > <div property="partOfPeriodical" typeof="Periodical" resource="#pdl"> > <span property="name">Cataloging & Classification > Quarterly</span>, > <span property="datePublished">2012</span>, > Vol.<span property="volumeNumber">50</span>(<span > property="issueNumber">5</span>),</div><div> > p.<span property="pagination">360-368</span> [Peer Reviewed > Journal]<br /> > <strong>Description:</strong> <span property="description">The > library catalog as a catalog of works was an infectious idea, which > together with research led to reconceptualization in the form of the > FRBR conceptual model. Two categories of lacunae emerge—the expression > entity, and gaps in the model such as aggregates and dynamic documents. > Evidence needed to extend the FRBR model is available in contemporary > research on instantiation. The challenge for the bibliographic community > is to begin to think of FRBR as a form of knowledge organization system, > adding a final dimension to classification. The articles in the present > special issue offer a compendium of the promise of the FRBR > model.</span></div><br /> > <div resource="#pdl"><strong>Publisher:</strong> > <span property="publisher">Taylor & Francis Group</span><br /> > <strong>Source:</strong> Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group<br /> > <strong>ISSN:</strong> <span property="issn">0163-9374</span> ; > <strong>E-ISSN:</strong> <span property="issn">1544-4554</span> > ;</div> > <strong>DOI:</strong> <a > href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01639374.2012.682254" > property="url">10.1080/01639374.2012.682254</a> > </div> > > - - - >8 - - - > > Check this out in <http://rdfa.info/play/> to see the data in action. > > The other is an attempt to use @itemref in microdata to do the same thing: > > - - - 8< - - - > > <div> > <span itemscope itemtype="http://schema.org/Article" > itemref="partof details"> > <strong>Title:</strong><span itemprop="name"> Be Careful What You > Wish For: FRBR, Some Lacunae, A Review</span><br /> > <strong>Author:</strong> <span itemprop="author">Smiraglia, > Richardp.</span><br /> > <strong>Subjects:</strong> <span > itemprop="subject">Catalog</span> ; <span > itemprop="subject">Works</span> <br /> > <strong>Is Part Of:</strong> > </span> > <div id="partof" itemprop="partOfPeriodical" itemscope > itemtype="http://schema.org/Periodical" itemref="publ"> > <span itemprop="name">Cataloging & Classification > Quarterly</span>, > <span itemprop="datePublished">2012</span>, > Vol.<span itemprop="volumeNumber">50</span>(<span > itemprop="issueNumber">5</span>),</div><div id="details"> > p.<span itemprop="pagination">360-368</span> [Peer Reviewed > Journal]<br /> > <strong>Description:</strong> <span itemprop="description">The > library catalog as a catalog of works was an infectious idea, which > together with research led to reconceptualization in the form of the > FRBR conceptual model. Two categories of lacunae emerge—the expression > entity, and gaps in the model such as aggregates and dynamic documents. > Evidence needed to extend the FRBR model is available in contemporary > research on instantiation. The challenge for the bibliographic community > is to begin to think of FRBR as a form of knowledge organization system, > adding a final dimension to classification. The articles in the present > special issue offer a compendium of the promise of the FRBR > model.</span></div><br /> > <div id="publ"><strong>Publisher:</strong> > <span itemprop="publisher">Taylor & Francis Group</span><br /> > <strong>Source:</strong> Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group<br /> > <strong>ISSN:</strong> <span itemprop="issn">0163-9374</span> ; > <strong>E-ISSN:</strong> <span itemprop="issn">1544-4554</span> > ;</div> > <strong>DOI:</strong> <a > href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01639374.2012.682254" > itemprop="url">10.1080/01639374.2012.682254</a> > </div> > > - - - >8 - - - > > This one became a bit more cumbersome, since @itemref is more tricky to > use when markup is interweaved like this. > > (Granted, I am more acquainted with RDFa (unsurprisingly, being a member > of the RDFa 1.1 WG). And I readily admit to favor the @resource > mechanism in RDFa over @itemref in microdata. So I may have overlooked > some trick to make it work better. There is also @itemid, which in > theory is analogous to @resource. But I'm not sure whether it is good > practice, or even valid, to use it repeatedly in the same manner.) > > Cheers, > Niklas > > > > On Sun, Dec 8, 2013 at 10:09 PM, Karen Coyle <kcoyle@kcoyle.net > <mailto:kcoyle@kcoyle.net>> wrote: > > All, > > Since there was interest I went ahead and did a first draft of a > minimalist proposal. I believe I have designed it such that, given > the flat nature of schema.org <http://schema.org>, it does not > preclude the more complete proposal offered by Dan. > > http://www.w3.org/community/__schemabibex/wiki/Periodical___Article_minimal > <http://www.w3.org/community/schemabibex/wiki/Periodical_Article_minimal> > > I did the examples there, and what with my limited coding skills, > you should expect to find (and feel free to fix) errors. Hopefully > the examples actually exemplify the proposal. At least, that was my > intention. I'll do more validation and testing of them if I find time. > > All suggestions, comments, corrections welcome. > > kc > -- > Karen Coyle > kcoyle@kcoyle.net <mailto:kcoyle@kcoyle.net> http://kcoyle.net > m: 1-510-435-8234 <tel:1-510-435-8234> > skype: kcoylenet > > -- Karen Coyle kcoyle@kcoyle.net http://kcoyle.net m: 1-510-435-8234 skype: kcoylenet
Received on Sunday, 8 December 2013 23:13:30 UTC