Re: First draft minimalist periodical/article proposal

Thanks, Niklas -

So you are suggesting that we need partOfPeriodical to make this work 
smoothly? And that would be a new property in Article? If I understand 
that correctly, we would then have:

Article

adds:
* partOfPeriodical
    - type: Periodical

kc

On 12/8/13, 1:42 PM, Niklas Lindström wrote:
> Hi Karen,
>
> Great! I did two variants of the article example, inlined below. In
> these, the items are linked (using our suggested partOfPeriodical). They
> also overcome a problem with the current version in the wiki, which
> describes four separate items (two articles and two periodicals).
>
> The first is in RDFa, and uses @resource to identify the article and
> periodical:
>
> - - - 8< - - -
>
>    <div vocab="http://schema.org/" typeof="Article">
>      <strong>Title:</strong><span property="name"> Be Careful What You
> Wish For: FRBR, Some Lacunae, A Review</span><br />
>      <strong>Author:</strong> <span property="author">Smiraglia,
> Richardp.</span><br />
>      <strong>Subjects:</strong> <span property="subject">Catalog</span>
> ; <span property="subject">Works</span> <br />
>      <strong>Is Part Of:</strong>
>      <div property="partOfPeriodical" typeof="Periodical" resource="#pdl">
>        <span property="name">Cataloging &amp; Classification
> Quarterly</span>,
>        <span property="datePublished">2012</span>,
>        Vol.<span property="volumeNumber">50</span>(<span
> property="issueNumber">5</span>),</div><div>
>      p.<span property="pagination">360-368</span> [Peer Reviewed
> Journal]<br />
>      <strong>Description:</strong> <span property="description">The
> library catalog as a catalog of works was an infectious idea, which
> together with research led to reconceptualization in the form of the
> FRBR conceptual model. Two categories of lacunae emerge—the expression
> entity, and gaps in the model such as aggregates and dynamic documents.
> Evidence needed to extend the FRBR model is available in contemporary
> research on instantiation. The challenge for the bibliographic community
> is to begin to think of FRBR as a form of knowledge organization system,
> adding a final dimension to classification. The articles in the present
> special issue offer a compendium of the promise of the FRBR
> model.</span></div><br />
>      <div resource="#pdl"><strong>Publisher:</strong>
>        <span property="publisher">Taylor &amp; Francis Group</span><br />
>        <strong>Source:</strong> Routledge, Taylor &amp; Francis Group<br />
>        <strong>ISSN:</strong> <span property="issn">0163-9374</span> ;
>        <strong>E-ISSN:</strong> <span property="issn">1544-4554</span>
> ;</div>
>      <strong>DOI:</strong> <a
> href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01639374.2012.682254"
> property="url">10.1080/01639374.2012.682254</a>
>    </div>
>
> - - - >8 - - -
>
> Check this out in <http://rdfa.info/play/> to see the data in action.
>
> The other is an attempt to use @itemref in microdata to do the same thing:
>
> - - - 8< - - -
>
>    <div>
>      <span itemscope itemtype="http://schema.org/Article"
> itemref="partof details">
>        <strong>Title:</strong><span itemprop="name"> Be Careful What You
> Wish For: FRBR, Some Lacunae, A Review</span><br />
>        <strong>Author:</strong> <span itemprop="author">Smiraglia,
> Richardp.</span><br />
>        <strong>Subjects:</strong> <span
> itemprop="subject">Catalog</span> ; <span
> itemprop="subject">Works</span> <br />
>        <strong>Is Part Of:</strong>
>      </span>
>      <div id="partof" itemprop="partOfPeriodical" itemscope
> itemtype="http://schema.org/Periodical" itemref="publ">
>        <span itemprop="name">Cataloging &amp; Classification
> Quarterly</span>,
>        <span itemprop="datePublished">2012</span>,
>        Vol.<span itemprop="volumeNumber">50</span>(<span
> itemprop="issueNumber">5</span>),</div><div id="details">
>      p.<span itemprop="pagination">360-368</span> [Peer Reviewed
> Journal]<br />
>      <strong>Description:</strong> <span itemprop="description">The
> library catalog as a catalog of works was an infectious idea, which
> together with research led to reconceptualization in the form of the
> FRBR conceptual model. Two categories of lacunae emerge—the expression
> entity, and gaps in the model such as aggregates and dynamic documents.
> Evidence needed to extend the FRBR model is available in contemporary
> research on instantiation. The challenge for the bibliographic community
> is to begin to think of FRBR as a form of knowledge organization system,
> adding a final dimension to classification. The articles in the present
> special issue offer a compendium of the promise of the FRBR
> model.</span></div><br />
>      <div id="publ"><strong>Publisher:</strong>
>        <span itemprop="publisher">Taylor &amp; Francis Group</span><br />
>        <strong>Source:</strong> Routledge, Taylor &amp; Francis Group<br />
>        <strong>ISSN:</strong> <span itemprop="issn">0163-9374</span> ;
>        <strong>E-ISSN:</strong> <span itemprop="issn">1544-4554</span>
> ;</div>
>      <strong>DOI:</strong> <a
> href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01639374.2012.682254"
> itemprop="url">10.1080/01639374.2012.682254</a>
>    </div>
>
> - - - >8 - - -
>
> This one became a bit more cumbersome, since @itemref is more tricky to
> use when markup is interweaved like this.
>
> (Granted, I am more acquainted with RDFa (unsurprisingly, being a member
> of the RDFa 1.1 WG). And I readily admit to favor the @resource
> mechanism in RDFa over @itemref in microdata. So I may have overlooked
> some trick to make it work better. There is also @itemid, which in
> theory is analogous to @resource. But I'm not sure whether it is good
> practice, or even valid, to use it repeatedly in the same manner.)
>
> Cheers,
> Niklas
>
>
>
> On Sun, Dec 8, 2013 at 10:09 PM, Karen Coyle <kcoyle@kcoyle.net
> <mailto:kcoyle@kcoyle.net>> wrote:
>
>     All,
>
>     Since there was interest I went ahead and did a first draft of a
>     minimalist proposal. I believe I have designed it such that, given
>     the flat nature of schema.org <http://schema.org>, it does not
>     preclude the more complete proposal offered by Dan.
>
>     http://www.w3.org/community/__schemabibex/wiki/Periodical___Article_minimal
>     <http://www.w3.org/community/schemabibex/wiki/Periodical_Article_minimal>
>
>     I did the examples there, and what with my limited coding skills,
>     you should expect to find (and feel free to fix) errors. Hopefully
>     the examples actually exemplify the proposal. At least, that was my
>     intention. I'll do more validation and testing of them if I find time.
>
>     All suggestions, comments, corrections welcome.
>
>     kc
>     --
>     Karen Coyle
>     kcoyle@kcoyle.net <mailto:kcoyle@kcoyle.net> http://kcoyle.net
>     m: 1-510-435-8234 <tel:1-510-435-8234>
>     skype: kcoylenet
>
>

-- 
Karen Coyle
kcoyle@kcoyle.net http://kcoyle.net
m: 1-510-435-8234
skype: kcoylenet

Received on Sunday, 8 December 2013 23:13:30 UTC