- From: Wes Turner <wes.turner@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2016 10:08:42 -0500
- To: Phil Barker <phil.barker@hw.ac.uk>
- Cc: "public-schema-course-extend@w3.org" <public-schema-course-extend@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CACfEFw9q+FRvf-scHb7M9r+W-5yDje76ZwJ=nqsUzqMecnTJWw@mail.gmail.com>
On Thursday, August 18, 2016, Phil Barker <phil.barker@hw.ac.uk> wrote: > Hello all, one last call for feedback on this (sorry I left it hanging > earlier in the summer, if you really have the time you can review the > discussion at https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-schema-course-ex > tend/2016Jun/0019.html ) > > In short I propose: > > 1. that we provide a property of course which can be used to point to an > educational credential that may be available to those who complete a course. +1 > > 2. that the expected type for this property be Text or Thing until such > time as a specific model for educational credentials be created -1 (see above) > > 3. that we do not attempt to model educational credentials as part of > this work. It's already modeled, ... > > It is on point 3 that I would most welcome feedback. > > See http://course.schema-course-extend.appspot.com/educationalCr > edentialAwarded for details > > Brief Rational: the ability to provide a name and a URI for and > educational credential which may be obtained by successful completion of > the course is enough fulfil the use case requirement of being able to find > courses that offer some specific requirement; modelling educational > credentials would divert us from completing what is necessary to fulfil the > other use cases; and, educational credentials touch on many communities > that are not well represented in this group. I seem to have been highly distracted Angry without work This is not at all controversial: Thing > CreativeWork > Credential We could, instead, choose not to define CredentialInstance at this time (because the relation between {Person,Organization} and {Credential > {...}} is out of scope for this go-round? > > Comments / feedback / dissent? > > Phil > > > On 22/06/2016 11:20, Phil Barker wrote: > >> >> I have drafted a description and a couple of examples based on the >> proposal below. >> >> See wiki >> https://www.w3.org/community/schema-course-extend/wiki/Ident >> ifying_the_qualification_offered >> >> and test course.schema site >> http://course.schema-course-extend.appspot.com/Course >> http://course.schema-course-extend.appspot.com/educationalCr >> edentialAwarded >> >> Any further comments/amendments? >> >> Phil >> >> On 20/06/16 14:05, Phil Barker wrote: >> >>> OK. As property name I am going to suggest educationalCredentialAwarded >>> because we might in the future want EducationalCredential as a class name. >>> >>> So, my proposal is that in order to meet the use case that people can >>> search for courses that offers a qualification the searcher would like to >>> acquire we create a new property >>> >>> educationalCredentialAwarded domain Course, range Text or Thing. >>> Definition: a description of the qualification, award, certificate, >>> diploma or other educational credential awarded as a consequence of >>> successful completion of this course. >>> >>> When the educational credentials/verifiable claims community have sorted >>> out how they want to describe their domain in schema.org then I hope we >>> will have some more specific schema type(s) that we can point to, but for >>> now this seems to me to be good enough to solve the use case. Solving the >>> bigger issue seems beyond the scope of this community group. >>> >>> Phil >>> >>> >> >> > -- > Phil Barker @philbarker > LRMI, Cetis, ICBL http://people.pjjk.net/phil > Heriot-Watt University > > Workflow: http://www.icbl.hw.ac.uk/~philb/workflow/ > > >
Received on Thursday, 18 August 2016 15:09:12 UTC