- From: Axel Polleres <axel.polleres@deri.org>
- Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 01:42:35 +0100
- To: "RIF (E-mail)" <public-rif-wg@w3.org>
1) > > I suggest to go with the way that fn:subsequence proposes, i.e. > > ?start ?length > > instead of > > ?start stop > > > > In general, I am afraid I need some more time to check all of the > list > > functions, hope to be finished before the next telconf though. > > This decision was made a long time ago, and it's too late to change it > (that is, it's after Last Call) without new information, etc. It's > not > like this is a bug; it's a coinflip decision we made as a group. > Acknowledged, but in that case * should we remove the "(adapted from fn:subsequence)" as it is quite different? * what is the indented behavior if ?stop is before ?start? i.e. sublist(List(0 1 2 3 4) 4 2) = ??? 2) > Yes, because negative indexes have a defined and useful meaning. > > See: > http://www.w3.org/TR/rif-dtb/#Position_Numbering > > > > I changed that to xs:nonNegativeInteger, since it made more sense > to me. > > Please change it back. > > - s Acknowledged as well, changed back to xs:int and referred to that section where necessary... please check. best, Axel -- Dr. Axel Polleres Digital Enterprise Research Institute, National University of Ireland, Galway email: axel.polleres@deri.org url: http://www.polleres.net/
Received on Monday, 21 September 2009 00:43:17 UTC