- From: Axel Polleres <axel.polleres@deri.org>
- Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2009 10:33:15 +0100
- To: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
- Cc: "RIF (E-mail)" <public-rif-wg@w3.org>
Sandro,
was there a reason why you specified the domain of the position
argument in
http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wiki/DTB#func:get
to be xs:int?
I changed that to xs:nonNegativeInteger, since it made more sense to me.
Please acknowledge.
Axel
On 20 Sep 2009, at 08:40, Axel Polleres wrote:
> Started to clean up DTB wrt. List functions and predicates... cf.
> ACTION-920
>
> Question: Is
>
> External( pred: is-list( List ( 1 | 2 ) ) )
>
> true or false or undefined? From the current informal definition
> this is not clear.
>
> I adapted the definition of
> http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wiki/DTB#pred:is-list
> assuming the former.
> Further, I added the following examples to the definition of is-list
> in DTB:
>
> is-list(List(0 1 2 | List(3 4))) = True
> is-list(List(1 | 2)) = True
>
> BTW, this is not RIF syntax, so the examples for lists in the
> document need to be
> in proper RIF presentation syntax, ie. instead it should be:
>
> External(pred:is-list(List(0 1 2 | List(3 4)))) will evaluate to t
> in any interpretation.
> External(pred:is-list(List(1 | 2))) will evaluate to t in any
> interpretation.
>
>
> I am not sure whether I manage to clean up all list functions, but I
> think we cannot have
> examples in the document which aren't valid for any syntax we
> support, so at least the examples should be cleaned up.
> Given ambiguities of the informal mappings like thes further
> convinces me that it we
> probably don't want the informal mappings in the spec. Opinions?
> (I am still not sure how far I get with the cleaning...)
>
>
> Axel
>
>
>
> --
> Dr. Axel Polleres
> Digital Enterprise Research Institute, National University of
> Ireland, Galway
> email: axel.polleres@deri.org url: http://www.polleres.net/
>
>
>
--
Dr. Axel Polleres
Digital Enterprise Research Institute, National University of Ireland,
Galway
email: axel.polleres@deri.org url: http://www.polleres.net/
Received on Sunday, 20 September 2009 09:33:57 UTC