- From: Axel Polleres <axel.polleres@deri.org>
- Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 01:53:07 +0100
- To: "RIF (E-mail)" <public-rif-wg@w3.org>
http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wiki/index.php?title=DTB&diff=11060&oldid=11006 I went through the list predicates and functions and adapted them as follows: * I added formal mappings where this was possible more or less straightforwardly in my opinion; I agree with Sandro that it doesn't make sense to add a formal mapping for the last 4 functions (union, distinct-values, intersection, except) but I checked these informal mappings again and am fine with them. I left the informal explanations as well, just to remain (hopefully) least intrusive. * I changed the examples to presentation syntax, since I wouldn't be to happy an undefined syntax in the examples; even if PS isn't normative, it is sufficiently specified. * I did some more editorial edits, like rewordigns in Section 4.11.1 and 4.11.2, which I'd appreciate to be checked. * From my point of view, this is all fine now, except one open issue noted with an editor's note in Section 4.11.4.4: It seems that the behavior of func:sublist for ?stop before ?start is not specifier. * BTW: Sorry about my forgetfulness, but did we decide on dropping the Editor's note on rdf:PlainLiteral (Section 4.10) already? Apart from the last two points, DTB should be ready to go, hope I didn't forget anything more. Axel -- Dr. Axel Polleres Digital Enterprise Research Institute, National University of Ireland, Galway email: axel.polleres@deri.org url: http://www.polleres.net/
Received on Monday, 21 September 2009 00:53:48 UTC