Thanks Manu, I think we are indeed done. B.t.w.: in a separate discussion with bibliography+schema people (there is a community group on this) I have run into an example where the property copying comes indeed very handy insofar as it simplifies the code for people who are not HTML or RDFa experts. I think we did the right thing with the introduction of the property copying stuff. Ivan On Jan 26, 2013, at 20:19 , Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com> wrote: > On 01/21/2013 01:13 AM, Gregg Kellogg wrote: >>>> I believe the 'if' clause should also include >>>> >>>> ?target rdf:type rdfa:Pattern >>> >>> Also, when copying, I don't think the rdf:type of rdfa:Pattern >>> should be copied; right? So I believe the "then add: ?subject >>> ?predicate ?object" needs a condition, like "unless: ?predicate = >>> rdf:type and ?object = rdfa:Pattern" (possibly put in a new >>> rightmost column). >> >> The remove triples also has an explicit pattern for deleting the >> rdfa:Pattern from the target, which is unnecessary. > > Ivan, Niklas, Gregg, I believe I've made the changes each of you > requested. Please double-check to make sure it's correct: > > http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/sources/rdfa-in-html/Overview-src.html#implementing-property-copying > > -- manu > > -- > Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny, G+: +Manu Sporny) > President/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc. > blog: Aaron Swartz, PaySwarm, and Academic Journals > http://manu.sporny.org/2013/payswarm-journals/ > ---- Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ mobile: +31-641044153 FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf
Received on Sunday, 27 January 2013 09:55:38 UTC