- From: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
- Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2012 23:13:29 -0400
- To: RDFa WG <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>
On 06/21/2012 10:23 AM, Alex Milowski wrote: > On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 3:08 AM, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org> wrote: >> I think this is a bit too negative. > > I agree that it is too negative. It's been re-worded: http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/drafts/2012/NOTE-rdfa-api-20120628/ > If possible, I would like to see the issues detailed or liked to from > this document. Unfortunately, we don't have a full list - the list exists in the collective memory of the group. Some of the list exists in group members heads that have since left the group. When we migrate the documents to a new group, we'll enter all of the issues in that issue tracker and update the spec at that point. > ...and, please let me know how I can help with this document. That's > a volunteer statement. :) We're going to try to transition the documents to a community group. Please join that community group and help us work out the kinks with the document. We'll definitely let you know when that group launches (within the next couple of weeks). -- manu -- Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny) Founder/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc. blog: PaySwarm Website for Developers Launched http://digitalbazaar.com/2012/02/22/new-payswarm-alpha/
Received on Friday, 22 June 2012 03:13:59 UTC