Thursday, 30 June 2011
Wednesday, 29 June 2011
- Microdata for RDF.rb
- Re: Should RDFa 1.1 xsd:strings be coerced to plain literals?
- Re: Should RDFa 1.1 xsd:strings be coerced to plain literals?
- Re: Should RDFa 1.1 xsd:strings be coerced to plain literals?
- Re: Should RDFa 1.1 xsd:strings be coerced to plain literals?
- Should RDFa 1.1 xsd:strings be coerced to plain literals?
- Telecon Agenda - June 30th 2011, 1400 UTC
Sunday, 26 June 2011
Friday, 24 June 2011
- Allow a prefix in the vocab attribute?
- <link> tags allowed outside <head> in HTML5
- Re: ISSUE-97 (HTML5 datetime support): Determine if datetime should be supported in HTML5 [RDFa 1.1 in HTML5]
- TAG issue on HTML+RDFa and Microdata last call drafts
Thursday, 23 June 2011
Wednesday, 22 June 2011
Saturday, 18 June 2011
Friday, 17 June 2011
- Re: ISSUE-96 (document not ready): Define how each API should behave when the document isn't fully loaded [RDFa 1.1 API]
- Re: TAG on microdata and RDFa
- Re: Comments on the RDFa Core Default Profile: dcterms prefix
- Re: Comments on the RDFa Core Default Profile: dcterms prefix
Thursday, 16 June 2011
- Re: [Draft] RDFWA WG comment on the HTTP Vocabulary in RDF 1.0 document: consider changing the 'http' prefix
- Re: [Draft] RDFWA WG comment on the HTTP Vocabulary in RDF 1.0 document: consider changing the 'http' prefix
- Re: [Draft] RDFWA WG comment on the HTTP Vocabulary in RDF 1.0 document: consider changing the 'http' prefix
- Re: [Draft] RDFWA WG comment on the HTTP Vocabulary in RDF 1.0 document: consider changing the 'http' prefix
- Re: [Draft] RDFWA WG comment on the HTTP Vocabulary in RDF 1.0 document: consider changing the 'http' prefix
- [Draft] RDFWA WG comment on the HTTP Vocabulary in RDF 1.0 document: consider changing the 'http' prefix
Wednesday, 15 June 2011
- Re: Comments on the RDFa Core Default Profile: dcterms prefix
- Re: Comments on the RDFa Core Default Profile: dcterms prefix
- Re: Comments on the RDFa Core Default Profile: dcterms prefix
- Re: Comments on the RDFa Core Default Profile: dcterms prefix
- Re: Comments on the RDFa Core Default Profile: dcterms prefix
- Re: Comments on the RDFa Core Default Profile: dcterms prefix
- Re: Comments on the RDFa Core Default Profile: dcterms prefix
- Re: Comments on the RDFa Core Default Profile: dcterms prefix
Tuesday, 14 June 2011
- Re: TAG on microdata and RDFa
- Re: TAG on microdata and RDFa
- Re: TAG on microdata and RDFa
- Re: TAG on microdata and RDFa
- Re: TAG on microdata and RDFa
- TAG on microdata and RDFa
Monday, 13 June 2011
- Telecon Agenda - June 16th 2011, 1400 UTC
- Re: ISSUE-97 (HTML5 datetime support): Determine if datetime should be supported in HTML5 [RDFa 1.1 in HTML5]
- ISSUE-97 (HTML5 datetime support): Determine if datetime should be supported in HTML5 [RDFa 1.1 in HTML5]
- ISSUE-96 (document not ready): Define how each API should behave when the document isn't fully loaded [RDFa 1.1 API]
- API behavior when content hasn't loaded fully yet
Friday, 10 June 2011
- Re: Comments on the RDFa Core Default Profile: dcterms prefix
- Re: Comments on the RDFa Core Default Profile: dcterms prefix
- Re: Comments on the RDFa Core Default Profile: dcterms prefix
Thursday, 9 June 2011
- Re: Comments on the RDFa Core Default Profile: dcterms prefix
- Re: Comments on the RDFa Core Default Profile: dcterms prefix
- Support for HTML5 datetime and data attributes
- Re: Comments on the RDFa Core Default Profile: dcterms prefix
- Re: Comments on the RDFa Core Default Profile: dcterms prefix
- Re: Comments on the RDFa Core Default Profile: dcterms prefix
- Re: Comments on the RDFa Core Default Profile: dcterms prefix
- Comments on the RDFa Core Default Profile: dcterms prefix
- Re: Official RDFa Response: ISSUE-90: CURIEorURI Value Space Collisions
- Re: Telecon Agenda - June 9th 2011, 1400 UTC