- From: Martin Hepp <martin.hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org>
- Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2011 23:31:33 +0200
- To: Gregg Kellogg <gregg@kellogg-assoc.com>
- Cc: Stéphane Corlosquet <scorlosquet@gmail.com>, "public-rdfa-wg@w3.org" <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>
Hi all: What about dct: for dcterms? I think that using dc: for dcterms may cause more confusion than good. Just my 2 cents. Martin Hepp On Jun 9, 2011, at 9:13 PM, Gregg Kellogg wrote: > On Jun 9, 2011, at 9:12 AM, Stéphane Corlosquet wrote: > >> If these prefixes are going to become widely used in the future, would it be possible to use the 'dc' prefix instead of 'dcterms' for http://purl.org/dc/terms/? 'dc' is shorter and will look more familiar to newcomers. This was discussed and advised in the DC-ARCHITECTURE during the development of RDFa in Drupal 7, see the rationale by Dan Brickley [2] and the responses from Thomas Baker and Mikael Nilsson [3]. > > +1 > >> regards, >> Steph. >> >> [1] http://www.w3.org/profile/rdfa-1.1#crawl >> [2] https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?A2=dc-architecture;6b83a7bf.0909 >> [3] https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?A2=ind0909&L=dc-architecture&D=0&P=26639 > > Gregg
Received on Thursday, 9 June 2011 21:32:00 UTC