ISSUE-3: scan of rdf-comments (completes ACTION-102)

I did a scan of the comments received on

   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/

from Feb 2004 onwards. Below is the result. To be on the safe side I 
included all threads that were not explicitly either closed or added to 
the errata list.

I expect most of the comments below to have been dealt with. The 
comments still need to be sorted wrt the document concerned.

Guus


POTENTIAL ISSUES

Media types and assertions, Mark Baker
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2004JanMar/0075.html

RDF Keys, Bob McGregor
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2004JanMar/0089.html

Inconsistency in RDF spec, Bill Davis
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2004AprJun/0018.html

Implementation feedback
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2004JulSep/0007.html

Difficulty with syntax spec, Klyne
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2004JulSep/0004.html

Pls warn against untested hooks, DanC
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2005JanMar/0003.html

RDF Semantics / error in RDFS entailment lemma, ter Horst
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2005OctDec/0003.html

RDF validator, Firefox
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2006AprJun/0000.html

Comment on RDF Model Theory, Jeremy Carrol
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2007AprJun/0001.html

N-Triples MIME type should not be text/plain, Tim Berners-Lee
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2007OctDec/0001.html


ERRATA

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2011JulSep/0000.html
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2011AprJun/0000.html
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2011JanMar/0000.html
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2010OctDec/0002.html
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2010OctDec/0001.html
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2010JanMar/0002.html
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2010JanMar/0001.html
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2010JanMar/0000.html
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2009OctDec/0000.html
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2009JanMar/0005.html
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2008OctDec/0000.html
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2008JulSep/0003.html
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2008JulSep/0000.html
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2008JanMar/0003.html
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2007OctDec/0018.html
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2007OctDec/0006.html
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2007OctDec/0005.html
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2007OctDec/0004.html
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2007OctDec/0003.html
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2007OctDec/0000.html
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2007JulSep/0000.html
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2006JanMar/0000.html
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2005AprJun/0000.html
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2005JanMar/0028.html
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2005JanMar/0001.html
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2004OctDec/0001.html
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2004OctDec/0000.html
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2004JulSep/0013.html
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2004JulSep/0005.html
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2004JulSep/0002.html

Received on Tuesday, 30 October 2012 10:32:55 UTC