- From: Dan Brickley <danbri@w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2005 15:34:34 -0500
- To: w3c-semweb-cg@w3.org, www-rdf-comments@w3.org
- Cc: danny.ayers@gmail.com
Fwd'ing to SW CG and www-rdf-comments for tracking. Thanks Danny. Dan ----- Forwarded message from Danny Ayers <danny.ayers@gmail.com> ----- From: Danny Ayers <danny.ayers@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2005 21:24:56 +0100 To: www-rdf-interest@w3.org Subject: W3C RDF docs admin comments Message-ID: <1f2ed5cd05011612245b70eb10@mail.gmail.com> Reply-To: Danny Ayers <danny.ayers@gmail.com> Resent-From: www-rdf-interest@w3.org Resent-Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2005 20:25:00 +0000 Not sure where this should go - can someone please forward as appropriate. Couple of things that cropped up while citing W3C RDF resources - there's (possibly unintentional) inconsistency with links from the 1999 specs, and it isn't clear whether the RDF Validator is current. There's a copy of the 1999 RDF M&S spec at: http://www.w3.org/TR/1999/REC-rdf-syntax-19990222 but the URI supplied for latest version: http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-rdf-syntax redirects to the RDF Primer: http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-primer/ The 1999 RDFS spec at: http://www.w3.org/TR/1999/PR-rdf-schema-19990303 declares "Newer Version Available", with a link to: http://www.w3.org/TR/PR-rdf-schema which is the 2004 Recommendation Elsewhere, the RDF Validator has a note saying it "supports the Last Call Working Draft specifications" - is it, or is it likely in the near future to be, sync'ed with the current specs? http://www.w3.org/RDF/Validator/ Thanks, Danny. -- http://dannyayers.com ----- End forwarded message -----
Received on Sunday, 16 January 2005 20:34:35 UTC