Re: Text about SPARQL-star built-in functions ready

I'm guessing James is referring to named graphs:
https://github.com/w3c/rdf-star/issues/25

Are there any examples of how RDF* can be combined with named graphs?

On Wed, Mar 3, 2021 at 10:22 AM Olaf Hartig <olaf.hartig@liu.se> wrote:
>
> James,
>
> On tisdag 2 mars 2021 kl. 21:09:13 CET James Anderson wrote:
> > good evening;
> >
> > > On 2021-03-02, at 18:56:40, Olaf Hartig <olaf.hartig@liu.se> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > I have implemented the proposal [1] to add the five new built-in functions
> > > to the spec. See the following PR
> > >
> > > https://github.com/w3c/rdf-star/pull/118
> > >
> > > For your convenience, here is the link to the preview:
> > >
> > > https://pr-preview.s3.amazonaws.com/w3c/rdf-star/pull/118.html
> > >
> > > The changes are in Section 4.2 (SPARQL-star Grammar) and in the new
> > > Section 4.4 (Function Definitions).
> > >
> > > As agreed during our telco last Friday, I will leave this PR open for
> > > three days so that your can take a look at it and raise concerns (if any).
> > > Unless anyone brings forward reasons that this PR should not be merged,
> > > I will merge it on Friday afternoon (CET).
> >
> > i raise the concern, that the approach needs to comprehend quads before it
> > will be usable.
>
> Not sure what exactly you mean by "quads." There is no definition of such a
> notion (neither in the RDF and SPARQL specs, nor in any draft of the RDF-star
> spec).
>
> Also, I don't see what "quads" have to do with the PR which focuses on the
> five new built-in functions.
>
> Please clarify.
>
> Thanks,
> Olaf
>
>
> >
> > best regards, from berlin,
>
>
>

Received on Wednesday, 3 March 2021 09:50:19 UTC