- From: Pavel Klinov <pavel@stardog.com>
- Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2021 11:45:35 +0100
- To: Martynas Jusevičius <martynas@atomgraph.com>
- Cc: Olaf Hartig <olaf.hartig@liu.se>, public-rdf-star@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CAJ-ZGXo6z7-_WKB6iqkS42rR279WA9TZxdieg99R5c5kT2yk3g@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Mar 3, 2021 at 10:50 AM Martynas Jusevičius <martynas@atomgraph.com> wrote: > I'm guessing James is referring to named graphs: > https://github.com/w3c/rdf-star/issues/25 > > Are there any examples of how RDF* can be combined with named graphs? > The concepts of RDF-star Graph and RDF-star Dataset defined in Section 2 allow RDF-star triples to be asserted in named graphs, just like regular RDF triples. This has also been discussed (with examples) in the following issue: https://github.com/w3c/rdf-star/issues/49 +1 to Olaf's point that this is orthogonal to the new built-in functions. Cheers, Pavel > > On Wed, Mar 3, 2021 at 10:22 AM Olaf Hartig <olaf.hartig@liu.se> wrote: > > > > James, > > > > On tisdag 2 mars 2021 kl. 21:09:13 CET James Anderson wrote: > > > good evening; > > > > > > > On 2021-03-02, at 18:56:40, Olaf Hartig <olaf.hartig@liu.se> wrote: > > > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > > > I have implemented the proposal [1] to add the five new built-in > functions > > > > to the spec. See the following PR > > > > > > > > https://github.com/w3c/rdf-star/pull/118 > > > > > > > > For your convenience, here is the link to the preview: > > > > > > > > https://pr-preview.s3.amazonaws.com/w3c/rdf-star/pull/118.html > > > > > > > > The changes are in Section 4.2 (SPARQL-star Grammar) and in the new > > > > Section 4.4 (Function Definitions). > > > > > > > > As agreed during our telco last Friday, I will leave this PR open for > > > > three days so that your can take a look at it and raise concerns (if > any). > > > > Unless anyone brings forward reasons that this PR should not be > merged, > > > > I will merge it on Friday afternoon (CET). > > > > > > i raise the concern, that the approach needs to comprehend quads > before it > > > will be usable. > > > > Not sure what exactly you mean by "quads." There is no definition of > such a > > notion (neither in the RDF and SPARQL specs, nor in any draft of the > RDF-star > > spec). > > > > Also, I don't see what "quads" have to do with the PR which focuses on > the > > five new built-in functions. > > > > Please clarify. > > > > Thanks, > > Olaf > > > > > > > > > > best regards, from berlin, > > > > > > > >
Received on Wednesday, 3 March 2021 10:46:00 UTC