Re: Text about SPARQL-star built-in functions ready

James,

On tisdag 2 mars 2021 kl. 21:09:13 CET James Anderson wrote:
> good evening;
> 
> > On 2021-03-02, at 18:56:40, Olaf Hartig <olaf.hartig@liu.se> wrote:
> > 
> > Hi all,
> > 
> > I have implemented the proposal [1] to add the five new built-in functions
> > to the spec. See the following PR
> > 
> > https://github.com/w3c/rdf-star/pull/118
> > 
> > For your convenience, here is the link to the preview:
> > 
> > https://pr-preview.s3.amazonaws.com/w3c/rdf-star/pull/118.html
> > 
> > The changes are in Section 4.2 (SPARQL-star Grammar) and in the new
> > Section 4.4 (Function Definitions).
> > 
> > As agreed during our telco last Friday, I will leave this PR open for
> > three days so that your can take a look at it and raise concerns (if any).
> > Unless anyone brings forward reasons that this PR should not be merged,
> > I will merge it on Friday afternoon (CET).
> 
> i raise the concern, that the approach needs to comprehend quads before it
> will be usable.

Not sure what exactly you mean by "quads." There is no definition of such a 
notion (neither in the RDF and SPARQL specs, nor in any draft of the RDF-star 
spec).

Also, I don't see what "quads" have to do with the PR which focuses on the 
five new built-in functions.

Please clarify.

Thanks,
Olaf


> 
> best regards, from berlin,

Received on Wednesday, 3 March 2021 09:21:42 UTC