Better wording, explanations, extensions, and Pat Hayes

I believe that we should stop the discussions about what we could have done, what cannot be done, what should be done in RDF 1.2.
We should focus definitely on explaining better what triple terms and reification in RDF 1.2 are, so that James, Thomas, Pat are satisfied in their (legitimate and useful) doubts in what RDF 1.2 is.
So, this is definitely at least RDF Concepts 1.5, and (in my proposal) a potential FAQ example-based informal document (to be prepared yet).
So, to be constructive, and in line with some proposal during today’s meeting, people having concrete suggestion on how to better write section 1.5 *given the current definitions of RDF 1.2 semantics* please step up and write down such badly needed proposals.
—e.