Re: Revisiting RDF-star semantics (was Re: Why is the RDF-star working group standardising RDF 1.2 and SPARQL 1.2?)

This has to be done carefully if blank nodes are to be transparent.

peter


On 1/27/23 13:30, Pierre-Antoine Champin wrote:
> On 27/01/2023 11:49, Antoine Zimmermann wrote:
>> (*) RDF-star basic semantics would be defined on any RDF-entailment regime 
>> by adding a mapping IT from embedded triples to the set of resources IR. 
>> Under this basic semantics, embedded triples simply act as distinct names, 
>> as if they were IRIs. This does not preclude extensions where the internal 
>> structure of the embedded triples makes a difference.
> I like that.
>
> Would you mind developing this further?
>
>   pa
>
> PS: also, the https://github.com/w3c/rdf-semantics repo is available for PRs 
> ;-)
>

Received on Friday, 27 January 2023 19:57:15 UTC