Revisiting RDF-star semantics (was Re: Why is the RDF-star working group standardising RDF 1.2 and SPARQL 1.2?)

On 27/01/2023 11:49, Antoine Zimmermann wrote:
> (*) RDF-star basic semantics would be defined on any RDF-entailment 
> regime by adding a mapping IT from embedded triples to the set of 
> resources IR. Under this basic semantics, embedded triples simply act 
> as distinct names, as if they were IRIs. This does not preclude 
> extensions where the internal structure of the embedded triples makes 
> a difference.
I like that.

Would you mind developing this further?

   pa

PS: also, the https://github.com/w3c/rdf-semantics repo is available for 
PRs ;-)