- From: Hausenblas, Michael <michael.hausenblas@joanneum.at>
- Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2007 08:57:53 +0200
- To: "Ben Adida" <ben@adida.net>
- Cc: "RDFa" <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>, "SWD WG" <public-swd-wg@w3.org>
+1 Cheers, Michael ---------------------------------------------------------- Michael Hausenblas, MSc. Institute of Information Systems & Information Management JOANNEUM RESEARCH Forschungsgesellschaft mbH http://www.joanneum.at/iis/ ---------------------------------------------------------- >-----Original Message----- >From: public-swd-wg-request@w3.org >[mailto:public-swd-wg-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Ben Adida >Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2007 4:45 AM >To: RDFa; SWD WG >Subject: [RDFa] ISSUE-3 @class and @role for rdf:type > > > >Another issue up for discussion. > >ISSUE-3 >http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/3 > >The question is what @class and @role should yield in XHTML1.1+RDFa. We >don't have complete consensus on this (we specifically note Steven >Pemberton's worries about the reuse of the @class attribute), but the >current solution, as accepted in the Primer and in many use >cases, is as >follows: > >@class yields rdf:type only if the value is namespace-qualified. @class >contains a space-separated list of values. Only those values which are >namespace-qualified yield rdf:type triples. > >@role does not exist in XHTML1.1, so it is not used here. In XHTML2, it >is expected to yield a triple with predicate xhtml2:role. > >+1 if you agree, otherwise email your disagreements and explanation. > >-Ben > >
Received on Wednesday, 27 June 2007 06:55:22 UTC