- From: Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net>
- Date: Thu, 12 May 2011 09:36:21 -0400
- To: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
- CC: SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
I've reviewed this document this morning. I checked in a couple of changes: * Changed "significant" to "not significant" when talking about the order of variables in the header for a SELECT * query * Fixed the syntax of the example when talking about "bindings" * Various typo fixes and small wording changes I'm satisfied with this document as is, now, and would recommend that we publish it as a Last Call Working Draft. I would like at least one other reviewer to concur. The document is not long, and will not take you long to review. Please help! Lee On 5/12/2011 6:34 AM, Andy Seaborne wrote: > http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/json-results/json-results.xml > > There is now a complete 1st draft document (and fairly unchecked). > > It addresses the comments made (Richard, Michael, Paul) by restructuring > the whole document and copying across content from before. I wil go back > and check the comments again but by the time the ties to the XML format > are removed, it's a rather different document. > > I have tried to strike a balance and retained a more informal style but > it should also be accurate. > > If anyone wants to have a go at JSON schema, > http://json-schema.org/ > then please do - I don't plan on doing that this time round. > > It's time for reviews. It's not a long document. > > Andy > >
Received on Thursday, 12 May 2011 13:42:30 UTC